Dan on Broadway (maybe)

[Steve]

--- In HPFGU-OTChatter at yahoogroups.com, "Jeremiah LaFleur"
<hpfreakazoid at ...> wrote:
>
> From the NY Post -
> 
> According to today's Daily Mail in London, the play just
> got a big accolade from the Big Apple.
> 
> Roger Berlind, a veteran New York theater producer, was
> reportedly so impressed with the play that he said he
> would help raise money to bring it to Broadway if the
> production was interested.
> 
> Berlind -- who watched Radcliffe during a packed preview
> of the play in London -- was also quoted as calling the
> Potter actor a "natural stage performer."
> 
> Harry Naked in NY
> http://blogs.nypost.com/potter/
> 
> just passing it along.
> 
> Steve/bboyminn
> ==================================
> 
> Jeremiah:
> 
> Now, wait asecond...
> 
> If Daniel Radcliff is 17 he cannot perform in the United
> States. He is underage and the play would, therefore, be
> concidered to be kiddie-porn.
> It's a technicality but definitely illegal.
> 
> However, at 18 he can be as naked as he wants on stage.
> 
> ...

bboyminn:

The play has a limited engagement of only 16 weeks. The 
orignal presentation of this show went for something like
1200 performances. So, after 16 weeks, it's back to 
filming Harry Potter. Though that should go much more 
quickly since the primary actors are all beyond school.

That means, he couldn't possibly perform in a Broadway
production until the break between the 6th and 7th 
movies. Even then, it would also have to be a limited
engagement.

By the time the next movie production break occurs, 
Dan will be 18, and will be able to perform nude on
Broadway.

If either show, West End or Broadway, is successful, it
could go on with an understudy when Dan is needed back
at the studio for the next movie.

Just passing it along.

Steve/bboyminn