[HPFGU-OTChatter] Re: Warning: Adults Only - Dan Radcliffe - Full

[Stacey Nunes-Ranchy]

:::Having been to quite a few museums and never been shocked by nudes:::

 

It seems to me that this photo COMPLETELY doctored!  Just looking at the
size of the legs that appear below, it's clear that they come from another
person.  Not to mention the fact that the body hair above and below a
certain point don't seem to match. Poor Dan..

 

Stacey

  _____  

From: HPFGU-OTChatter at yahoogroups.com
[mailto:HPFGU-OTChatter at yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of krista7
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 5:15 PM
To: HPFGU-OTChatter at yahoogroups.com
Subject: [HPFGU-OTChatter] Re: Warning: Adults Only - Dan Radcliffe - Full

 

> I know we are generally an adult group but I want to add
> special ***ADULTS ONLY WARNING***.
> 
> At the link below you will find a general article about
> Dan Radcliffe appearing nude and smoking on stage. 
> However, there is one additional feature, and relative
> to this one features, I must again warn *Adults Only*.
> 
> Scroll down below the 'Google Ads' until you see a
> small postage stamp sized photo of Dan. Even from the
> very small photo you can see it is one of the publicity
> shots for 'Equus'. HOWEVER, is has NOT been crop at
> the delicate and strategic area.

I haven't followed the link (I'm not exactly comfortable 
with seeing Dan this way!) but my understanding is that 
any true nude shots of Dan are Photoshops. One celeb site 
(Oh No They Didn't) debunked at least
one nude photo by saying either the photographer or Dan 
had noted in an article that no full-frontal photos of 
Dan existed--they didn'ttake a single true full nude shot,
because they knew it would not end up being used in the 
sphere of just play publicity.

Krista

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]