[HPFGU-OTChatter] RE: Spoiler Warning

[P. Alexis Nguyen]

On 7/19/07, Lee Truslow <specialcritters at hotmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not the only one that thinks it wasn't all that revealing!!
> http://www.amazon.com/NY-Times-Released-Early-Review/forum/Fx2KME5D081OEJH/TxL6R51SQM6WPT/1/ref=cm_cd_ef_tft_tp/104-3558435-1123931?%5Fencoding=UTF8&cdItems=25&cdAnchor=0545010225&asin=0545010225
>

I'm with you.  It wasn't revealing at all.  While there were things
that were technically spoilers in the "review," there was nothing that
could truly spoil the book for you.  There were no answers to the big
questions - well, there was that note telling us what Deathly Hallows
refer to, but it didn't explain anything.  In other words, it's much
akin to HP being a detective/mystery novel and the review giving us
one or two new clues.  It's nothing major, and I don't understand all
the big fuss being kicked up about it.

But then, I don't mind spoilers since I believe that book reading is
as much a journey, but then, that's likely why I don't understand the
seemingly-intense anger that some people are feeling.

~Ali