Re: Harry’s fate according to the bookies

[eggplant107]

"Geoff Bannister" <gbannister10 at ...> wrote:

> But don't forget that the bookies have
> often burned their fingers badly in the past. 

Yes bookies can be wrong, but not often. Bookies are professionals,
making bets is how they make their living and they must be very good
at it or they'd starve to death. Face it, the book has leaked, you
can't print tens of millions of books, as they must be doing at this
very instant, and keep the contents a total secret; they couldn't even
keep secret how to build an H bomb! It's so obvious to the betters and
the bookies that Harry will die that they refuse to take bets on the
subject, the only thing still uncertain to the bookies is who killed
Harry, Snape of Voldemort, but I expect that will be leaked too before
long.

And not only do I think the bookies are right I hope they are too.
Right after book 4 came out I predicted Dumbledore would die at the
end of book 6 and Harry would die at the end of book 7.  I think that
is the perfect way to end the series and to ensure that the Harry
Potter books will live even if Harry Potter dies. In fact, the series
will live because Harry Potter dies. People will be reading the Harry
Potter books a century from now.

Eggplant