Re: Harrys fate according to the bookies (more literary spoilers)
Geoff Bannister
gbannister10 at tiscali.co.uk
Tue Jun 5 20:53:51 UTC 2007
--- In HPFGU-OTChatter at yahoogroups.com, "dumbledore11214"
<dumbledore11214 at ...> wrote:
> Carol:
> <SNIP>
> I'd say that Harry has more in common with Odysseus
> > than Achilles, or with Frodo (who doesn't die, regardless of the
> > implications of the film) than with Sigurd the Volsung. But again,
> > the elements of myth, legend, saga, and epic are not the primary genre
> > she's working in.
Geoff:
If I may go off at a tangent (which one is allowed to do on OTChatter!),
LOTR is a book which has been a constant companion for me for (gulp)
just over 50 years and I have never accepted that Frodo dies in the
accepted sense - and I do not think that the film suggests that either.
People have speculated about this for years but I do not think that a
parallel can be drawn between the books because the circumstances
of the stories are so different.
My hope remains that Harry will survive; the thought has suddenly
crossed my mind that perhaps as an adult, like Diggory Kirke in the
Narnia books, he might become a mentor figure for future generations
of young wizards as they face whatever problems the post-Voldemort
Wizarding world will meet.
More information about the HPFGU-OTChatter
archive