More (or less ) Dan on Broadway

[Steve]

--- "Geoff Bannister" <gbannister10 at ...> wrote:
>
> ---  "Steve" <bboyminn@> wrote:
> >
> > It seems that David Pugh the Producer of Equus has 
> > had offers from 11 Broadway Producers to bring Equus
> > to New York.
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > ""As of Thursday morning, there were 11 offers from 
> > different producers - ...," said Equus producer David
> > Pugh."
> > 
> > ""Both Daniel and Richard are up for it ..."
> > 
> > Note the last part, Dan and Richard are UP FOR IT, 
> > ....
> > 
> > ...
> 
> Geoff:
> Hmm. I'm wondering, Steve, if you're being naughty 
> with the capitalisation. If you made a remark like that
> to a number of the young guys in my church, in view of
> the context, they'd either be bright red or rolling on
> the floor laughing.  I think I will join the latter group
> ... :-)
>   
> Seriously though, the UK press has been suggesting next 
> spring or summer after the HBP prinicipal filming is over.
>

bboyminn:

I can only assume you are referring to 'UP FOR IT', which
you will notice that David Pugh actually said himself.

Would it help if I said, I thought they could pull it off?

Seriously though, we are at a severe disadvantage in our 
ability to express ourselves in pure text. I understand
why they have Italics, Bold, and Underline turned off, 
but that still doesn't help when you want to highlight 
an expression. 

Also, when I am dropping innuendo, I am usually much LESS
subtle than that. As to Kemper comment about the photo 
collection of the 'photo faker', and the /long/ odds of
having the appropriate photo on hand, there might have
been a slight subconscious innuendo involved there. 

But again, how extensive a collection of photos must 
this person have, to have had that exact match lower
body readily available? Really enquiring minds want
to know. 

Steve/bboyminn