One reporter reacts to JKR's revelations

[dumbledore11214]

> Magpie:
> I did mean that the law was on her side--and the publishers received 
> several "friendly letters." The lawsuit wasn't jumped to by any 
> timeline that I've heard. Whether or not her own ability to sell her 
> book is being damaged I wouldn't say--I don't think it would be. But 
> I legally it seems like she's in the right here--and she's not being 
> very aggressive about her rights as she could be in that area in 
> general.


Alla:

It seemed to me that whether this book will interfere with her 
encyclopedia sales ( and I do not think it will be either), it is just 
very irrelevant and I took it on her part as additional explanation, 
the one she did not even need to go into.

I mean, the bottom line to me is that IF the book is direct copy of 
the Lexicon, that is her work being sold by another person, you know?

And it seems to be wrong to me.


And it is not like I think all those lawsuits by her lawyers are 
right. That one in India, when they sued non profit for making castle 
on the festival, I thought was disgusting and was very happy that they 
lost.

This one I hope they will win and fast.

JMO,

Alla