One reporter reacts to JKR's revelations
sistermagpie
sistermagpie at earthlink.net
Mon Nov 5 15:05:25 UTC 2007
> Carol responds:
>
> I'm not saying that sex isn't being depicted in "YA" books
(although i
> think that's disturbing). I'm objecting to the term "young adult
> literature" for readers who are actually children or younger
> teenagers. They're not young adults. The term is a euphemism, as if
> "adolescent" or "pre-teen" or "teenage" were somehow insulting
terms.
Magpie:
I know you're objecting to the term, but it's a standard term in
publishing so it seems pointless to put it in quotation marks when
it's long been the actual term for the books we're talking about.
I've never heard anybody refer to actual teenagers as Young Adults,
but I've been using the term for books I recognized as such for most
of my life.
Carol:
In the
> cartoon, little girls were labeled "prewomen" because "girls" was
> supposedly offensive. Thank goodness the extreme views of the early
> 90s have disappeared, but the fondness for euphemisms is still
> prevalent.
Magpie:
This was being used before the political correct jokes of the 90s. I
remember the term YA when I was a teen.
Carol:
And, IMO, "young adult" for readers who are actually
> children is both euphemistic and misleading. They're not adults and
> they're not ready for adult content in their books. If we have
NC17 as
> a category for movies, surely we ought to have something comparable
> for books. (Even in the WW, where kids come of age at seventeen, a
> sixteen-year-old is considered a child.)
Magpie:
It depends on what you mean by adult content. What should be allowed
in YA in your opinion is a different issue, that they might disagree
with or not. I'm not saying all books in this category are
graphically sexual by any means, but certain topics are routinely
covered. Sexuality being one of them, of course, since it's often in
adolescence that a teen might realize s/he is gay or their friend
is.
Carol:
> Carol, just clarifying her use of "so-called" and noting that "YA"
> literature is not an accepted literary genre but a category used by
> bookstores to classify their books
Magpie:
And publishers as well for the same reason. Whether or not one
objects to gay characters in books for teenagers (or children, since
they also appear in books for younger readers), or teenagers being
called young adults JKR would not be the first if she had actually
had gay people explicitly in her canon.
-m
More information about the HPFGU-OTChatter
archive