The Fair Use Doctrine
sistermagpie
sistermagpie at earthlink.net
Thu Apr 17 03:28:33 UTC 2008
Carol responds:
> Step 1 for JKR should be to stop worrying about how much work (hers
or
> his) has gone into compiling the Lexicon, how it's affected her
> emotional state, and all other irrelevancies. Step 2 is to
familiarize
> herself with copyright law, especially the Fair Use doctrine, and
> understand how copyright violation differs from plagiarism. And
step 3
> should be to have someone do a computerized comparison of the
Lexicon
> (print version) to her books and see what percentage of the text
falls
> under "verbatim copying" and "close paraphrase."
Magpie:
I believe she (or those representing her) has done the last two. Her
side's got expert witnesses in copyright and have also gone through
the book for this. There's a pie chart made by her side--probably
spinning it as close their position as possible--but they have gone
through the work. She's not making the argument--though her lawyer
obviously wanted to put some drama on the stand with all the
irrelevent stuff about hard work, sloppy work, writer's block etc.
Not sure what that was in aid of, since there's no jury to make feel
sorry for anyone. From what I've heard her legal team has been very
well-prepared--much more so than RDR's who has put people on the
stand saying they don't remember things and also pulled out e-mails
where SVA contradicted his own position.
-m
More information about the HPFGU-OTChatter
archive