That case and that book

[nrenka]

--- In HPFGU-OTChatter at yahoogroups.com, "Carol" <justcarol67 at ...> wrote:


> Carol responds:
> But it *isn't* "merely an alphabetical arrangement of something [JKR
> has] already created. That's what her side is *claiming*, true, but 
> if the print version resembles the online version, the only one I 
> have access to, that description is inaccurate. 

Okay.  This is THE TEXT of the Lexicon--at least what was submitted to
the court after JKR's people finally got RDR to pony up the text,
after tons of excuses and whatall.

http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-york/nysdce/1:2007cv09667/315790/52/

This is Steve's declaration, and at the end you get a description of
the filings, which are broken up because they're so long.  (Look for
the links on the bottom right hand side, under 'Attachment 1', etc.)

Take a look here at attachment 2:

http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-york/nysdce/1:2007cv09667/315790/52/2.html

This is an alphabetical list.