[HPFGU-OTChatter] Re: In support of my Prince Harry theory.

[Cabal]

-----Original Message-----
From: HPFGU-OTChatter at yahoogroups.com
[mailto:HPFGU-OTChatter at yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of kempermentor
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 11:25 PM
To: HPFGU-OTChatter at yahoogroups.com
Subject: [HPFGU-OTChatter] Re: In support of my Prince Harry theory.


Kemper now:
Hey MD!  I thought you were talking to Steve until I came to the 'for
you' part.  
Yes, it makes it easier for me.  The rule was here before me as well.
 (This group is nearly 8 years old)I didn't understand it, but
followed it after getting a howler from my elf, Shorty.  It sucked!
Snipping, attributing and signing... lame!  But, as time passed, I've
come to understand it, appreciate it, and can't imagine going back to
my old way.  I can see if you haven't yet or won't ever.

I've taken the high standard of this group and practice it in other
groups whose members are less -clear?- in some of their posting or
responses.

Kemper


------------------------------------

All the other groups I've belonged to (and those I still do) I snip leaving
the "original message" info intact, the only difference is that everyone
post above. That way, if you are following the threads and reading the post
in order you can just click through with your e-mails arranged by time /
date received and you can read most of the post just in the preview window
-- I'm a scanner and a skimmer, so that works real well for me. 

For my personal taste having to scroll down through everything I've all
ready read to look for the new post --- it's been explained to me but I
still don't get the appeal.

Oh well -- not my group, I'm just a guess... when in Rome.


md