Worst books ever read (was: Re: Freaks and Geeks LONG and uncoherent ramble
Lee Kaiwen
leekaiwen at yahoo.com
Sat Feb 23 09:50:25 UTC 2008
Kemper now:
> Da Vinci ... was painfully predictable. ... the author wrote
> as though his audience was stupid.
Correct on both counts. Not to mention insipid writing, paint-by-number
character development (let's see, Sophie's ("'Sophie'? Please!")
mysterious back-story needs, umm, sex ... check ... murder .. got it
.... intrigue ... working on that now), and "impeccable" research that
was wrong more often than not (any first-year art student could tell you
The Last Supper is *not* a fresco).
I once wrote a review of DC that ran something like this: "The book hits
you with what is undoubtedly it's greatest blunder before you've even
opened it. The man's named is Leonardo, please. Vinci was his hometown.
How can you take seriously a piece of historical fiction whose very
title screams out 'Penned by an historical ignoramus!'?"
About two-thirds of the puzzles Langdon encountered I had figured out
before he did (and, like you, even many of the puzzles themselves I saw
coming well in advance), which left me spending most of the book waiting
for the idiot main character to get a clue. What was the device he
carried around for half the book before discovering it was actually a
key? The first time I read its description I said (actually out loud),
"It's a key." And it took Langdon in excess of another hundred pages to
figure that out.
As for insipid writing, the scene where Teabing "reels back in shock" on
his crutches in seeing Silas on his patio springs to mind as one of the
more egregious examples. Please! When have you *ever* seen anyone "reel
back" for any reason? The whole book had the feel of B movie full of
high school acting.
> As for Shadow, I threw it across the room when I was done.
A la Dorothy Parker, yes? "This is not a book to be set down lightly. It
should be thrown with great force."
> Similarly, Cool World was the movie I learned I could walk out on.
Well, that was one I couldn't walk out on, as I watched it at home.
> Kemper, who believes some books should be burned
> CJ: As an act of mercy, yes.
> Kemper now:
> And as an act of vengeance.
I was thinking of saving the next poor soul the torture. Though I did
actually once shred a book a mail it back to the author :-)
CJ
More information about the HPFGU-OTChatter
archive