"Put down" or "put to sleep"? Killing animals
sistermagpie
sistermagpie at earthlink.net
Fri May 2 14:14:51 UTC 2008
Alex:
> "Put to sleep" is a ridiculous term meant to make it "OK" to kill
animals. They just go to sleep. Yeah, right. They are killed. Rather
nastily. Go to your local pound if you do not know what goes on there.
They should have happy lives, not a doomed future. Get your animals
spayed and neutered before they create more little lives that have to
be snuffed out. And if you want a pet, get one from a shelter, they are
so thrilled and happy to be with someone who wants them! They are the
best! Especially cats. Sorry, my personal love of kitties is a bit much.
Magpie:
I still don't see what's so ridiculous about it. Of course everybody
knows it means they're being killed. And not nastily at all, imo. I sat
with a dog while they did it not too long ago. They put her to sleep.
First one tranquilizer so she was gone, then another to put her to
sleep, and then the one that killed her, with me and my roommate
petting her the whole time.
The nasty part was the brain tumor causing her constant pain. If you
prefer the term "put down" or "killed" or "euthanized" I'm fine with
any of them--I don't use "put to sleep" as a euphamism but because
that's the term that's most common to me. "Put down" doesn't
say "killed" any more than put to sleep, after all. She was dead at the
end any way we say it.
She was spayed, though, of course, and she came from a shelter and I
think she did have a happy life before that. (Don't know what happened
before she was abandoned and wound up in the shelter, but she was
generally happy.)
-m
More information about the HPFGU-OTChatter
archive