Protest the passage of Prop 8
doddiemoemoe
doddiemoemoe at yahoo.com
Sun Nov 16 08:05:46 UTC 2008
I suppose prop. 8 will cause massive havoc in the end...
Yea or neigh...there are just so many states to protest in...
Realistically thinking...it'd be better to ban all civil
unions...why on earth does the state need to be involved with
marriage anyhow(beyond revenues?)? Harkens back to the days of
monarchy!
Is there any reason why the goverment needs to sanction marriage?
Government needs to remove itself from the marriage dept entirely...
If truth be told, in the U.S. any marriage ceremony falls under
the "right to privacy act" hence, government has little, if any
right to interfere.
It just stinks to me..seems like the goverment has its hands full
already withougt bothering with marriages.
My brother and I were raised outside of the U.S. because so many
states deemed my parents marriage "unlawful"...Why legislate
marriage at all? Marriage began as a religious ceremony...let it
remain so..
When one thinks of all the money wasted to change a law the
goverment has no right to involve itsself in to begin with..it makes
me wonder where on earth were all the attorney's hiding before the
election.
If the government has no rights to interfere with a patient/doctor
relationship...then the goverment has no right to interfere with a
husband/wife/domestic partner relationship unless the/an individual
asks, or breaks criminal law.(hence the u.s.'s illustrious judicial
system).
Sorry but I don't think the government has the right to decide who
should marry whom...(Isn't that one of the many reasons why so many
countries adopted republic/democtratic regimes?--Kinds/Queens
arranging marriages with noble/powerful families?!?).
DD
(Who thinks it is beyond ridiculous that those who were married
before said proposition passed can remain so legally-in all states
where same sex marriage was lawful..but no new marriages can occur.
Ludicrous)
More information about the HPFGU-OTChatter
archive