[HPFGU-OTChatter] Re: About the lawsuit...
Sheryll Townsend
s_ings at yahoo.com
Tue Sep 9 21:16:22 UTC 2008
> > Sheryll:
> >
> > I didn't see anything in the ruling that prohibits
> them from
> appealing and presenting a revised edition of the Lexicon
> book. Of
> course, they'd have to remove the reference to the
> schoolbooks and
> change the instances where they've used JKR's own
> words to describe
> the entries. Other than that, doesn't the conclusion
> say that this
> type of work is permissible?
> >
>
>
> Alla:
>
> Nothing prevents them from appealing definitely, but what
> my
> understanding they cannot do is to go over the permanent
> injunction,
> which is the remedy in equity and just say oh yes, we
> removed
> offensive references, we are not taking as much of
> protected creative
> expression and now the book is ready for publication.
>
> They have to IMO if they decide to do so appeal first.
>
> Judge said this type of guides is permissive, but this
> particular
> book is not, not this particular book can be okay if
> revised.
>
> JMO and I can be wrong of course.
>
Sheryll:
I'm pretty sure you're more educated about the law than I am, that's for sure!
Okay, so they can't just come back with a revised book and try to publish. But they can revise and try to appeal. Would that be correct?
Sheryll
__________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Canada Toolbar: Search from anywhere on the web, and bookmark your favourite sites. Download it now at
http://ca.toolbar.yahoo.com.
More information about the HPFGU-OTChatter
archive