[HPFGU-OTChatter] Re: Star Trek

[Karen Lewellen]

going to try for the third time to see it tomorrow.
Its described, which I do not normally do, but given what I have heard of 
the action, I thought I would do dvs this time.
Still I wish I could find an another trekker in Toronto to treat it really 
should be shared.
Karen

On Sat, 9 May 2009, Leeann McCullough wrote:

> I am the 45 year old daughter of an original trekkie. This movie was a must see for me. My dad and I went together (since no one else would) and I am so glad we have things like this to share.
>
> Back to the movie itself...Kemper is right, when the movie was over I said to myself, "Oh crap, I really have to go!".
> It is all action all the time.
>
> Go and enjoy!
>
> Leeann
>
>
>
>
> Kemper wrote]:
> | The action doesn't stop but you don't feel like you need a
> | break like you do in a Michael Bay movie which you could
> | easily go to the bathroom, drop a deuce, wash hands with soap
> | and warm water for twenty seconds being sure to get between
> | the fingers, dry hands with a paper towel that you'll use to
> | open the door before tossing it into the garbage, head over
> | to the concession stand for some Jr Mints or maybe a Kit-Kat
> | bar (it's hard to decide, the cost is prohibitive for both),
> | get back to your seat with some Milk Duds instead because
> | they sounded good all without needing to ask your buddy in
> | the next seat what you missed because you know it wasn't a
> | gee-dee thing.
>
> [Lee]:
> <LOL> Uh--That's how I felt when I tried "The Truman Show" on the airplane
> returning from Los Angeles back in 1998...And I did indeed need a bathroom
> break with thorough hand-wash, and a bit of a line, etc. I got back to my
> seat something like 10 minutes after leaving and felt like I had missed
> absolutely nothing. Then, at one point, I dozed off and woke up realizing
> that something new was happening and my interest was peaked for the next few
> minutes. :-)
>
> Glad to hear the "Pre" TOS movie offers good entertainment.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lee :-)
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>