Harry Potter gets Naked .... Really?

[bboyminn]

As you many have discovered by now, David Yates has made a 
comment in an interview indicating that Dan Radcliffe playing
Harry Potter will 'get naked' in one of the last Harry Potter
movies.

Though, there is one scene in the books where he is naked,
the death scene where he meets Dumbledore at King's Cross
station, this scene seem completely made up. 

I'm wondering if it isn't some kind of dream sequence. I also
wonder if the reporter who originally reported this, hasn't
himself gotten mixed up and combine several unrelated comments
by David Yates into one.

The comment as it stands now is -

"Daniel Radcliffe appears naked in one scene where Harry and 
Ron are fighting a magical creature, who fled to confuse and 
create a vision. In the view we see Harry and a woman embracing
and kissing. It's an intriguing scene and very sensual. "

Really? Harry is naked while he and Ron fight Magical Creatures?
And apparently, though it is very confusing, as the creatures
retreat, the 'create a vision'? 

Is this really necessary? It seems like a pointless diversion
that has no purpose other than showing Harry Potter/Dan Radcliffe
naked. I think there is a long complex story to tell, shouldn't
they be concentrating on that? 

Just a thought.

Steve/bboyminn