[HPFGU-OTChatter] Re: DH sign question
Sue Wartell
swartell at yahoo.com
Thu Sep 3 16:17:28 UTC 2009
zanooda:
... I can see now from your responses guys (thanks, BTW :-)) that I didn't pose the question correctly, sorry about that. I meant to ask something like this: "Is such an interpretation (three-part object) possible at all?" I mean, regardless of the shape :-). If, theoretically speaking, the sign was a square, with a circle and a line inside, could it be called "triangular sign" because it consists of three elements? The question is about the meaning of the word and its use, mostly :-).
Sue:
No one I know would ever use the word triangular for anything that was not a 3-sided figure (which is another way of saying a 3-angled figure.) "Tripartite" would work for your theoretical square-circle-line figure, but "triangular" would not. Informally, someone might call it a "triple sign" meaning (again) that it contains 3 parts, but that would not be the usual usage of triple.
More information about the HPFGU-OTChatter
archive