Catagorical or UNCatagorical - The Grint Denial
Steve
bboyminn at yahoo.com
Wed May 4 07:13:45 UTC 2011
A few days ago a made a post about an alleged photo of Rupert smoking pot. Personally, I thought is was some random red head, and that is where the similarity ended.
Now Rupert's representatives have said -
""This is categorically Not Rupert Grint. It is an impersonator/lookalike."
I'm sorry, but is that the right way to say it?
Doesn't "categorically" mean this statement is true within certain qualifiers or within limited context?
Shouldn't it be '...UNCategorically not Rupert...', meaning this is absolutely and without qualification not Rupert.
Something that is 'categorically' true is true within certain limitations and definitions.
Something that is 'uncategorically' true is absolutely and without qualification true.
Or, do I have this backwards?
Not that it matters; just curious.
Steve/bboyminn
More information about the HPFGU-OTChatter
archive