Trelawney's prediction

harry_potter00 harry_potter00 at yahoo.com
Sat Aug 5 23:50:00 UTC 2000


Original Yahoo! HPFG Header:
No: HPFGUIDX C5905
From: harry_potter00
Subject: Re: Trelawney's prediction
Reply To: [Yahoo! #5902] Re: Trelawney's prediction
Date: 8/5/00 7:50 pm  (ET)

<<<"Danemead said maybe Professor Trelawney 1st predicition was Harry
being the down fall of Lord V">>>


A lot of the stories from Mythology consist of this type of
thing. Prophecy that someone will overthrow someone else, therefore first
person is eliminated (but not really), and grows to fufill prediction
which they never knew until after...This is a pretty bad summary.

We know that V. wanted Harry dead, and that he killed Lily to get to
Harry. Therefore we assume that he didn't NEED to kill Lily, unless
he just liked killing by then. James on the other hand was killed for-
we-know-not-why. (Does this make sense???)

What I'm trying to say is that if Trelawny's prediction had to do with
V.'s trip to the Potter home that night, then it must of also had some
to do with JAMES and w/ Harry...






More information about the HPforGrownups-Archives archive