Wand Order Issues (Forwarded message)
smitster
kippesp at swbell.net
Mon Nov 13 04:55:48 UTC 2000
No: HPFGUIDX 5708
--- In HPforGrownups at egroups.com, Amanda Lewanski <editor at t...> wrote:
> This had occurred to me, too. I've always thought the wand order
thing could
> just have been a mistake, but this "fix" doesn't sit right. It
doesn't sound
> like a rewrite from her hand; it sounds like a cut-and-paste of her
words
> from the hand of the editorial staff. Someone should ask JKR about
it. Has
> she a site, an address, an agent? I can't believe nobody asked
about this in
> any of the interviews?
>
> --Amanda, only on the list for a couple months, so you guys would
know more
I remember one person asking about the wand ordering issue without
specifics to the two versions. JKR said something to the effect
of "Ahh. You noticed that." Unfortunately, I didn't even know about
this edition difference until I read it here on HP4GU. Does JKR have
any more interviews scheduled? Perhaps if enough people know about
it, it will come up.
Has anyone sent notice to the news people who also reported wand
thing just after the release of HP4? Of course, Harry Potter isn't a
current issue anymore, so any information sent to them would no doubt
get ignored.
Tonight I did run by my local bookstore but couldn't find any 9th- or
later-edition printings. I'll check two other bookstores tomorrow.
(I'd like to read this myself.) Perhaps there hasn't been enough
time for this change to permeate the HP community. Plus, I think
Penny mentioned this, most of the HP crowed already has the book
which would be some of the earliest printings.
Paul
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive