Snape: Was fatal flaw
foxmoth at qnet.com
foxmoth at qnet.com
Tue Oct 10 15:53:28 UTC 2000
No: HPFGUIDX 3122
> I think Snape is clearer-eyed that we are allowed to see. I see a bit of the
> attitude of Edmund from one of the Chronicles of Narnia books (Prince
> Caspian, I think; the second one). Where he's been woken by his sister Lucy
> and told something unbelievable and his reaction is stated along the lines
> of "while he fully intended to back Lucy up, he was annoyed at losing his
> night's sleep and intended to do everything as sulkily as possible." I think
> Snape has every intent of supporting the good, for whatever reason. But he
> does it in the snarliest manner possible, and carries way too much emotional
> baggage around.
>
> --Amanda
Right on, Amanda. I think Snape's rage at the end of PoA over
Sirius's escape is partly feigned. I think he is laying it on thick for
Fudge's benefit, knowing it will get back to Malfoy, Sr. It has always
struck me that Snape had the opportunity to turn Sirius over to the
Dementors when he (Snape) recovered consciousness, but chose to bring
him to the castle with Harry and the others.
Also, it is clear to me that Snape guesses Harry is trapped in
the step in GoF and makes a very theatrical show of trying to catch him
while not actually doing so. Of course any one being a double agent
would have to be a good actor, as Sirius points out. It is clear that
Snape had his suspicions of Moody...do you suppose that Snape tried to
warn Dumbledore that something was not right and got ignored, having
cried, "Wolf" too often <g> ?
Pippin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive