[HPforGrownups] Harry's grandparents
Penny & Bryce Linsenmayer
pennylin at swbell.net
Wed Oct 25 17:53:45 UTC 2000
No: HPFGUIDX 4599
Hi --
eggplant88 at hotmail.com wrote:
> Well we know one of Harry's grandparents is named Potter and another
> Evans, I'll bet one of the other two is named Granger. Maybe that's
> why Harry and Hermione seem to love each other but not romantically,
> they're cousins.
Well, first off Amanda's right -- the Dursleys are Harry's only living
relatives.
But, even if you believe JKR could be "fudging" on that issue, consider
genealogically how it would have to work & it's clear that Harry &
Hermione could not possibly be first cousins. At best, they might be
second cousins but even that is a bit far-fetched if you believe that
the Dursleys are his only living relatives. In any case, it's
impossible that they have a blood relationship that would prevent them
from marrying.
It'll be hard to draw a genealogical chart into this email but I'll try
to explain narratively --
1. Harry's paternal grandparents are the Potters. His grandfather's
surname was Potter. His paternal grandmother --- we will call X.
2. Harry maternal grandparents are the Evanses. His maternal
grandfather's surname was Evans. His maternal grandmother -- we will
call Y.
3. The Evanses have 2 known children -- Lily & Petunia. Even if Y's
maiden name is Granger, that would mean that Y was a sibling of the
Hermione's paternal grandfather. This would make Hermione's father a
first cousin to Lily & Petunia. Hermione would be Harry's 2nd cousin if
that were true.
4. The Potters only have one known child -- James. Same analysis as in
#3 if X's maiden name were Granger.
Don't know the rules on that in England, but it would be highly doubtful
that such a tenuous relationship would prevent them from marrying.
Nice try Eggplant! :--)
Penny
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive