Finnegans Wake & OT responses in general
Penny & Bryce Linsenmayer
linsenma at hic.net
Sat Sep 9 16:44:27 UTC 2000
No: HPFGUIDX 1229
Hi --
MSN wrote:
> [...] ...Hey! We're back to Finnegan's Wake again. There is a limit,
> I
> guess. [...]
>
> If you're going to refer to that, please refer to it properly - it's
> "Finnegans Wake". Note, there's no apostrophe.
I assume you're a James Joyce fan MSN?
Perhaps I've misinterpreted your tone, but it seems a bit rude to me.
And completely pointless. Is that correction *really* necessary given
that this is a HP listserve? I think correcting things such as this
ought to probably be limited to HP corrections. Or, if you were sending
a substantive post, and you wanted to say "BTW Neil -- it's actually
Finnegans Wake (no apostrope)" -- that would have been fine.
I do think we should all strive to keep completely off-topic (OT) posts
*and* OT responses to a minimum.
Thanks --
Penny
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive