Straight from the horse's mouth... (possible spoilers)
Vicki Merriman
vjmerri at iquest.net
Thu Sep 14 22:10:01 UTC 2000
No: HPFGUIDX 1442
--- In HPforGrownups at egroups.com, "Blaise " <blaise_writer at h...>
wrote:
>
> been quite embarrassing... here's some possible spoilers that she
let
> slip...
> S
> P
> O
> I
> L
> E
> R
>
> S
> P
> A
> C
> E
>
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *
>
> - Mrs Figg is a squib. Godric's Hollow (where is that again?) is
> gonna be very important as is Snape and the whole thing with
Harry's
> eyes! She says Snape could still turn out to be either bad or good
> but she's not telling us which.
Mrs. Figg is a squib! Well whats the point of her baby sitting Harry
if she didn't have any magic to protect him from Voldemort or his
revengeful death eaters? I thought the whole point was that he was
under magic protection when the Dursleys weren't with him. What a
surprise. Maybe her house has special protections built into it by
other magicians, and maybe she could use an "anyone can invoke it"
spell or something to call for help. That's the only explanation I
can think of.
Godric's Hollow definitely has to be where GG came from 1000 years
ago, and it seems inevitable (unless JKR pulls the rug out from under
us) that Harry is a descendant of Godric Griffindor. Perhaps a
descendant's magic would be heightened when physically in the Hollow,
even though it didn't help James or Lily.
so the eyes ARE important. That's really interesting also. How
about this. James was a descendant of Griffindor and Lily was a
descendant of Slytherin, thus making Harry the joint descendant of
both, the one to end the feud. That must be a fairly common theory on
the list. Over the years I am sure that there are lots of muggle
descendants of magicians. Wouldn't Petunia croak.
Re Snape - He may flip flop a time or two in the course of the next
books, but it seems almost too obvious for him to truly be evil. Its
like a gimme.
> Isn't that interesting? A really big death in 5 - Lupin? (please
> no!) Ron? Dumbledore? Sirius? I wonder whether whoever it is
will > hang around as a ghost (tying this in with our discussion of
the > week).
I don't think JKR would have the dead person remain as a ghost,
because ghosts are so real and present in her universe that it would
almost be as though the person didn't die at all. If she is aiming
for the impact that she seems to be, the person will die and that
will be that.
It probably won't be Ron because, again, that's too obvious. If
there is a big death in five we're stuck with Dumbledore, one of the
twins, or Mr. or Mrs. Weasley. I don't think she'll go for Sirius or
Lupin in five. I'm inclined to think it will be a Weasley, either
one of the twins or one of the parents. That would be really hard.
Do you remember that clock that JKR made pains in GoF to tell us
about, the one which has a hand for each weasley and a space around
the face for "mortal peril?" It seems to me that she wouldn't have
invented the clock and specifically told us about the "mortal peril"
bit unless one of the Weasleys was going to be there shortly.
Vicki
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive