HP and The Ten Commandments #1
Zarleycat at aol.com
Zarleycat at aol.com
Mon Aug 6 23:54:19 UTC 2001
No: HPFGUIDX 23752
--- In HPforGrownups at y..., foxmoth at q... wrote:
>
> 1) I the Lord am your God who brought you out of the land of Egypt,
the
> house of bondage.
snip
In Rowling's world, as in many folktales, magical objects
> improperly obtained or malignly used exact a vengeance on their
> possessors. There are many examples of this: Hermione's
misadventures
> with the polyjuice potion, Lockhart's disastrous attempt to put a
> memory charm on Harry and Ron, the threatening phantoms that emerge
> from Voldemort's wand. If this is a known principle of the magical
> world, it would explain why Dumbledore is so permissive. Magical
crimes
> punish themselves in the end, so he merely needs to protect the
> innocent until the guilty have reformed themselves or paid the
ultimate
> price for their misdeeds.
The idea of magical crimes punishing themselves seems to work to some
extent on what I'll call minor misdeeds. Dumbledore can afford to be
lenient if the idea is that misuse of things like the polyjuice
potion or Lockhart's idiocy are the crimes. But, if you look at
other crimes, those outside of Hogwarts, we don't have evidence that
this theory holds up. Peter Pettigrew has not paid for his crime -
Sirius Black has paid for it. Granted, Peter may get his in the end,
or he may pay for his actions in some selfless act later on, but he
may still find a way to slither out of sight if things go wrong for
Voldemort. And we've been told that a number of DEs managed to avoid
imprisonment by saying they were under the Imperious Curse, and not
responsible for their actions. Again, in the future, we may see that
people's actions come back on them, but at this point in the series,
there are a number of people who have gone unpunished.
Marianne, who thoroughly enjoyed this post and is looking forward to
the next nine.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive