JKR's writing as craft (Was FAQF)
Jim Ferer
jferer at yahoo.com
Wed Aug 8 05:25:21 UTC 2001
No: HPFGUIDX 23852
Prefectmarcus:" 'That's not a Quick Quotes Quill, is
it?' 'No sir. Those things are garbage.' Does anybody reading this
recognize the reference?"
Actually, we probably all do. There's a lot of people on this list who
know this tale as well as anyone anywhere.
Prefectmarcus:"The rest [fanfic] were very forgettable. So I suspect,
at least for me, there is more to it that just good characters. True,
they are an essential ingredient, but certainly not the only or the
most important one."
Most fanfics don't give us anything good in characterization, and the
writing is usually execrable. The writing is important.
J.K Rowling is a fine writer. I've always thought so. Her stories
wouldn't be what they are if the ideas didn't make it to the page so
clearly. But the language she uses isn't art by itself, as it can be
with writers like Tolkien, Twain, or Patrick O'Brian. And that's OK.
Part of it is that she's writing for a younger audience, and keeps her
writing as accessible as she can.
What do we spend our time talking about so much? The characters. The
Trio. Malfoy. Snape. Dumbledore. People a hundred years from now will
know who they are, as they know who Hamlet, Macbeth, and Sherlock
Holmes are.
There's been stories about apprentice wizards before, and about kids
who had a target on their backs before. There's books about
combinations of all these elements, and many of them are well written.
But they don't have Harry Potter in them, do they?
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive