Winky's presence during Crouch interrogation
Caius Marcius
coriolan at worldnet.att.net
Fri Aug 24 17:23:03 UTC 2001
No: HPFGUIDX 24837
--- In HPforGrownups at y..., cynthiaanncoe at h... wrote:
> I have always been puzzled about why JKR has Dumbledore summon
Winky
> for Crouch's interrogation. Here are Winky's lines (abbreviated):
>
> As far as I can tell, Winky is just making a lot of noise and
adding
> nothing of substance. So why did JKR include her in the scene?
> Wouldn't it have been better to just do the interrogation and be
done
> with it? Or is there some reason I'm missing that Winky needs to
be
> there?
Good question - of course we don't know much about the effectiveness
of Veritaserum. Perhaps there are powerful antidotes that can protect
the subject from the serum's truth-telling effects. If that's the
case, Winky may have been included by Dumbledore as a means of
establishing Crouch's veracity. She probably wouldn;t have so reacted
to a fictitious account.
- CMC
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive