[HPforGrownups] Re: Peter vs. Sirius once again

[Denise R]

No: HPFGUIDX 12532

That particular spell wasn't the one used during the Death Mark Chapter,
though, when they discovered that Harry's wand was the one that created the
Death Mark.

THAT is the spell we should be discussing, right?  Nothing to do with cores
there! :)

(Working off of memory here, so I am not going to pull the name out of my
blonde brain--it's still too sleepy!)

______________________________________________
 

~~Dee~~
:)

We live in a wonderful world that is full of beauty, charm and adventure.
There is no end to the adventures that we can have if only we seek them with
our eyes open.

-Jawaharlal Nehru
Get ICQ and get connected!  ICQ me @ 21282374
http://www.icq.com

For those who love to cook:
http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/cakesandale
______________________________________________
 

----- Original Message -----
From: "Meghan" <meg at fenya.net>
To: <HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2001 1:11 AM
Subject: Re: [HPforGrownups] Re: Peter vs. Sirius once again


> Amanda Lewanski wrote:
> >
> > Scott wrote:
> >
> > > Fourthly maybe Sirius HAD killed someone last, and so the PI did in
> > > fact show AK as the last curse. It just wasn't the AK that they
> > > THOUGHT it was. (Maybe though this wouldn't work. Do all PI's of AK
> > > produce shades???)
> >
> > I'd argued before that not all spells cast with a wand are necessarily
> > going to produce tangible "echoes" during priori incantatem. Witness the
> > screams that come from Voldemort's wand; we as readers happen to know
> > that was because he'd cast Cruciatis (sp?) on someone, but if you had no
> > idea, the priori incantatem would not enlighten you. Perhaps the
> > wizarding world is well acquainted with the limitations, and thus does
> > not use it except in situations where they are simply confirming a
> > strong suspicion (i.e., the Dark Mark). With a street full of witnesses
> > and the Secret Keeper arrangement known (they thought), perhaps priori
> > incantatem was not thought necessary.
>
>
> And for some reason I thought you had to have an exact twin core to do
> it in the first place? O.o
>
> I don't have GoF with me [>_< In storage.  Since November.  Because we
> thought we'd have the new house by now.  And you don't know how tempted
> I am to simply suck it up and buy a used copy] but I think I remember
> something about Dumbles saying something to the effect that a) Priori
> Incantatem was a RARE effect, and ONLY occured when two wands were made
> with the same cores.  In Voldemort and Harry's case, the feathers from
> Fawkes.
>
> [And we will all pause, and not go there, about how Riddle was suited to
> a feather from DUMBLEDORE'S phoenix, and also where the heck he had his
> wand while in hiding/without a body. =P]
>
> meg
> crosseyed with sleepiness
> --
> Meg -- meg at fenya.net -- http://www.fenya.net
> AIM: LazuliSong ICQ: lazulisong
> D N Angel, Card Captor Sakura, General Evil Things
>
>
> Brought to you by Harry Potter for Grownups. For more information, see our
> website at groups.yahoo.com/group/HPforGrownups -- also, you can check out
our eGroups/YahooGroups merger pointers file at
groups.yahoo.com/group/HPforGrownups/files/+merger.txt
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> HPforGrownups-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
>
>