Interim Ruling
rainy_lilac at yahoo.com
rainy_lilac at yahoo.com
Mon Feb 19 17:13:25 UTC 2001
No: HPFGUIDX 12620
Okay so here is how I read this:
Stouffer's claims about defamation, interference, and all that
nonsense etc. are dismissed completely. GONE. Kills Bugs Dead.
Her charges of tradmark infringement however may be refiled so that
she can have her day in court, but that in allowing her to do this the
Judge is not necessarily showing her claims any favor. In other words,
nobody is saying that she has proven anything, or that her claims are
sound, only that her claims in this case exist and the procedure is to
hear them out.
Is that correct?
This would click with what a lawyer told me once-- he said that in
cases like this even the most ridiculous ones will get their days in
court because judges tend to be conservative about these matters. They
would rather hear the case.
Heidi?
Thanks!
Suzanne
P.S. Uhmmmmm... so tell me, if Judge Heidi Tandy is presiding over the
case of Sirius Black.... Uhmmmmm.... I would say things look bright
for our hero? *wicked grin followed by a swoon*
P.P.S. I just clicked on your address here in yahoo to write to you--
I can now be reach at rainy_lilac at yahoo.com.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive