Lestranges' crime

[msmacgoo at one.net.au]

No: HPFGUIDX 8757

I 
> just put stuff down from memory without actually pulling out my 
notes 
> and making sure. I will have to go in and edit that page, either 
> removing their names entirely or putting some sort of "possibly" 
> statement in there. Unless, of course, Snuffles can bail me out and 
> tell me for sure that the Australian edition DOES name them as 
being 
> the ones sentenced with Crouch Jr.? 
> 
> Steve "So much for 'Constant Vigilance'" Vander Ark

I'll check this evening, but I'm SURE (without the book to check - 
what a dangerous statement) that they are named because of the 
unnamed person, unless that was a process of elimination thing ... oh 
dear, now I'm wondering ..... 

will get back to you this evening

storm


--- In HPforGrownups at egroups.com, "Steve Vander Ark" <vderark at b...> 
wrote:
> Hey, gang:
> 
> Clipped from a few posts:
> 
> > > It never actually says that they were the Lestranges, though 
most 
> > people think they
> > > are because of the woman's fanaticism speech, and the fact that 
> we 
> > know they're in
> > > Azkaban.
> 
> 
> > were gone and went to Azkaban rather than renounce him.  From 
this 
> > scene, I got the impression that the Lestranges were the couple 
> that 
> > Harry saw in the Pensive with Crouch, Jr.
> 
> 
> The fact of the matter is, I knew this. I knew that it wasn't given 
> as fact, but that most fans assume that it's the case. In the 
> Lexicon, I try extremely hard not to let these assumptions creep 
in, 
> but only publish verifiable fact (I'm a regular Binns about it). 
But 
> this one, I must admit, slipped by me. I was in one of those modes 
> where I was creating new pages left and right and I did the Azkaban 
> page on a whim as I was creating the Dementor page and as a result 
> The Harry Potter Lexicon
> http://www.i2k.com/~svderark/lexicon