[HPforGrownups] Re: "Fanfic Tangent" (ship warning)
mlleelizabeth at aol.com
mlleelizabeth at aol.com
Sun Jan 21 11:24:31 UTC 2001
No: HPFGUIDX 9977
I've tried to resist, but just can't. And since I find myself agreeing with
Ebony on ship issues (will wonders never cease! <g>), well, then, I just must
...
Most of what I'm replying to was written by Ebony, but she was replying to
another post (the author of which is not known to myself) so some of the
comments I'm replying to are *not* hers. I have attempted to note those that
were stated by someone other by Ebony if I knew that was the case. I have
probably made mistakes and for those I apologize.
So (bracing myself) here goes!:
<< As I've said, we H/Hers are steeling ourselves for impending doom... oh,
I mean, the Inevitable R/H Pairing.>>
Doom? Goodness! I hope it's not that awful for you. I really mean that. I
think Ms. Rowlings has her reasons for heading in that direction, and that
they'll make sense and possibly be less awful for you when (and if) they
happen.
< All right, Switzerland! I enjoy both R/H fics and H/H fics as well. >
And I enjoy het fics as well as slash fics. I actually find the ones that
deal with minor characters most intriguing.
[Ebony responded to the following]:
>Harrykins and Hermy-oh-ninny don't belong together any more than Ronny-poo
belongs with Hermy-oh-ninny, at least, not until the Creator says so.>>
And during a bout of aol's evilness I seem to have lost her response. I
apologize, but also add:
And maybe, just maybe, Harrykins and Hermikins and Ronniekins *all* don't
belong together. Or maybe Harrykins and Ronniekins belong together. But it
is all up to Ms. Rowlings, whom I believe is the Goddess of the Potterverse.
<snip of lots of really good stuff>
<There's a ton of Hermione-suicide fics, too, only one of which I've ever
liked (I honestly can't remember the title/author right now, but it was a
stream of > consciousness that was beautifully written but didn't > give you
enough back story to ruin the moment). I do think that our favorite trio,
being in Gryffindor, ... should show a little more backbone than that - after
all, in Gryffindor "dwell the brave of heart," and to use a cliche, suicide
is the coward's way out.>
There were a lot of quotes in this post, and I'm not entirely sure who wrote
that last bit ... I don't want to offend anyone or wrongly state that anyone
has said anything, but I do want to reply to this. I agree that suicide is
*sometimes* the coward's way out. Under torture or other unbearable
situations, I don't believe suicide is cowardly. I have experienced severe
clinical depression and I know that it is impossible to react to it in any
way that makes sense to people who have not experienced depression and that
persons who end there lives under that condition are not being cowardly. It
really is that awful to them. I also know that you can't make yourself
undepressed or non-suicidal on your own. I do believe that a Gryffindor
faced with a life surrounded by dementors might choose to end their life and
I would not consider that cowardly.
I'm very, very sorry that you've lost peers and friends to suicide. I very
recently lost my mother the same way. It hurts in a way that nothing else
does.
I'm still not in favor of banning anything anyone's written, but I do
understand how much it must hurt you.
<Killing off the viewpoint character, unless there is a good reason to do
so, is a cop-out in most cases. This is why I don't think Harry will die in
Book 7. Or if he dies, he may not stay dead... etc.>
It does occur in folklore/mythology, which is what I believe Ms. Rowlings is
writing. It's not a good choice for commercial purposes, but it is actually
a traditional theme. In addition, Ms. Rowlings has gently prepared her
audience for that eventuality in interviews. Harry's death may not happen,
but it is not inconceivable.
<more respectful snipping>
< because despite all of our ship debating, Harry, Ron, and Hermione are
first and foremost *friends*. Ron has feelings for Hermione. Has anyone ever
considered that he *might* step aside or tamp those feelings down?>
Why would he do that? Do you really think it's acceptable for a person to
sacrifice their feelings for another in order to let the "Hero" get the girl?
<Also, here's another argument I hear often from the R/H side: "Harry is
the hero. Harry has everything and Ron has nothing. Harry can't have the
girl too." First, the premise of the argument bothers me. I love the
Weasley family to pieces and feel that any kid lucky enough to grow up with
Arthur and Molly for parents has a lot. Harry would trade all his fame in a
heartbeat to be in Ron's shoes. And vice versa.>
I believe this is a mythology/folklore issue. Are there any persons onlist
who have made extensive studies of mythology and/or folklore or who have
degrees in mythology and/or folklore who can address it? [Aside to anyone
who's interested: do the descriptions of Lily sound at least just a bit like
descriptions of The Morrigan to you?] I've read almost everything I could
get my hands on about the subject, but I still haven't read enough and I
don't have a degree, so I can't speak authoritatively. I can say that I
think that the "Hero doesn't get the girl/sidekick does get the girl"
scenario almost never occurs in folk stories. IIRC from the many stories
I've read, either the story is directly and emphatically about the
Hero/Heroine winning the heart of the "Object of Desire" or the whole
romantic thing is a complete red herring (if it's even there) and the Hero
Saves the World/Wins the Throne, etc. and walks away alone, with the romantic
liaisons of the sidekicks entirely unknown. The Harry Potter series does not
seem to be following the "Hero Wins the Object of Desire" model.
I must add to this that I don't believe any Object of Desire exists in Ms.
Rowlings' Potterverse. Hermione as written in canon is not flawless (no,
she's not!), and Ginny is um, uncertain (yes, she is!) and most Objects of
Desire are quite deliberately described as such.
<more respectful snippage>
<*That* is a problem in the friendship between the two boys that has nothing
to do with Hermione. Both of them, in some measure, wants to be the other.>
Started to disagree, then noticed the "in some measure," so ... okay.
<<Secondly, most of the H/Hers I talk to are bothered by the idea of Ron
getting the girl on the basis that "he likes Hermione, and Harry's the hero,
so Ron gets the girl." Hermione isn't a possession! She's their best
friend, an equal, or as fanfic writer Parker put it so aptly in "Friend
Enough?"--"the brains of this operation, the glue that holds us together".
>>
True, Hermione isn't a possession. Neither is Harry. Hermione doesn't "get"
Harry because she's clever or witty or any of the many other nice things she
is.
As I tend to identify with Harry, I bristle at the suggestion that *anyone*
should "get" him. Poor boy! He's not a prize, you know, he's a person! And
to force him to spend the rest of his life with a bossy, know-it-all,
stifling person (and that *is* the way Ms. Rowlings has described Hermione so
far) is not exactly fair to Harry! Henpecked!Harry totally squicks me.
Forcing Harry to spend the rest of his life with anyone is really not very
kind to him. I most object to the H/H pairing because I consider it a
"shotgun wedding" for Poor Harry.
Why can't Harry be independent and happy?
I agree that Hermione is one of the brains of the operation. Ron is another
brain of the operation, although of a different (but equally important) sort.
Harry's blessed to have them both to rely on as friends.
<<Why don't any of these arguments take her feelings into account? >>
I don't believe they should, but neither do I believe that Ron's feelings
should be taken into account. The books are written from Harry's point of
view. Unless Harry is a psychic empath or Hermione declares her feelings
directly to Harry, we can't really know what Hermione's feelings are, nor are
they the focus of the story.
<R/Hers insist that the Yule Ball events prove that she had tamped- down
feelings for Ron. My take on it is that the whole business left a rather
nasty taste in her mouth re: both of her best friends.>
I agree. I believe that's why she'd look elsewhere (even into her adulthood)
for a romantic partnership.
Absolutely. Just as it's ridiculous to believe that Harry would necessarily
fall into Hermione's arms.
<<Let's wait to see what Hermione thinks in canon.>>
I hope you are not holding your breath. Unless she makes a statement to
Harry, I don't believe that we will ever know that with certainty, nor is it
particularly important to Harry's story. Even if Hermione does make it
evident that she is romantically inclined towards Harry, that does not create
an H/H ship.
< For all we know, she might very wisely conclude that she'd rather keep
her friendships the way they are... and continue to correspond with Viktor
Krum.>
Indeed she may! Maybe Ron and Harry will be ushers at the wedding.
I have a feeling that Harry will not be involved romantically with anyone at
the end of the books and that he may have considerable difficulty in forming
relationships with anyone, even in the future, unless he gets some really
good therapy. After all, the persons who should have been raising him were
killed (possibly, although not certainly, because of *who* he is). The
persons who are raising him abuse him. The second person in the wizard world
who attempted to befriend him turns out to be a nasty, slimy git who bullies
him. The person who attempted to kill his parents is still after him. The
one teacher he feels sure is evil and out to get him is actually trying to
save his life and on the side of the good guys. The person he believes
betrayed his parents did not betray them. His friend's pet rat did betray
his parents. Harry doesn't exactly have a firm foundation for trusting
others.
And I'll speak from experience on the issue as well: when the people you most
depend on abuse you, forming trusting, loving relationships is extremely
difficult. It also makes you very brave.
You're very probably hooking Hermione up with someone who's suffering from
PTSD. It could be dicey for them both.
My ship pet peeve: the odd insistence that any of us are necessarily and
unequivocally right in our ship beliefs, regardless of Ms. Rowling's
statements and/or canon writings. I must reiterate that I believe that Ms.
Rowlings is the Goddess of the Potterverse and I accept her scenario
(whatever it may be) in spite of my own hopes and wishes.
10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
Love & Light,
*Elizabeth*
90% obsessed and proud of it!
~ You can never have too many Weasleys ~
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive