Arthur Weasley/Wizarding government
Charmian
sashibuya at hotmail.com
Thu Jan 25 21:49:24 UTC 2001
No: HPFGUIDX 10685
--- In HPforGrownups at egroups.com, Dave Hardenbrook <DaveH47 at m...>
wrote:
> At 03:25 AM 1/24/01 +0000, Mike Schubert wrote:
> >What do you
> >think he would be equated to in, say, U.S. politics? A major
cabinet
> >member? The head of a more minor Dept.? Just an interesting
question.
>
> Oh, I'd say probably equivalent to Secretary of Housing and Urban
> Development. ("Where they slide the food under the door" -- Mark
Russell)
>
>
I would guess it's very hard to do equating, because in Britain they
have a cabinet style, parliamentary democracy, rather than the system
in America where the executive and legislative are more separate,
even though in both of them cabinet posts are appointative positions
that change with political administrations, wheras Arthur appears to
be a rather high ranking civil servant, who's influential, but has
been there for years. It seems that for wizards, there is only one
ministry, thus making Fudge kind of like the prime minister, although
we don't know the precise relationship the wizarding world has with
Parliament. I mean, are there elections in the wizarding world? Are
there political parties? MPs? What's the judicial system like? Just
how did Fudge get made (and who made him) Minister of Magic? Somebody
with more knowledge of the mechanics of the British political system,
help me make up some kind of better explanation here. :)
Charmian
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive