[HPforGrownups] Re: Why didn't the Potters disapparate?

[Deeblite]

No: HPFGUIDX 23194

At 08:07 AM 7/29/01 +0000, you wrote:
>\
>This theory also makes a lot of sense. The Potters are hardly going
>to apparate away and leave their one year old son behind. From what
>we've seen in the books, apparition takes the person and their
>possessions, but not other living things.

Yeah, any things you touch.  Which could make for an interesting practical 
joke- grab a hold of a wizard's robes, and then disapparate- the robes come 
with you, leaving the other wizard standing there nekkid as the day they 
were born (assuming wizards ARE born nekkid) ^_^


-- 
Deeblite
WTF is an acronym?