Portrayal of Dudley (was FAT)
hfakhro at nyc.rr.com
hfakhro at nyc.rr.com
Fri Jun 8 16:05:34 UTC 2001
No: HPFGUIDX 20423
--- In HPforGrownups at y..., "Amy Z" <aiz24 at h...> wrote:
> And yet with Dudley she can't stop calling him "fat," again, like
kids
> who can't let a pudgy classmate walk by without snorting like
pigs.
> That's what disturbs me.
>
> There are three occasions I can recall where someone makes fun of
> someone else's weight: Harry calling Dudley "a pig in a wig,"
Draco
> calling Mrs. Weasley "porky" and Pansy calling Neville a "fat
> crybaby." In two of the three cases, we're clearly supposed to
side
> with the pudgy person. With Harry, I can't blame him--I called my
> bullying sister worse things than that and she wasn't nearly as
nasty
> as Dudley--but I wish it weren't there because I'd like to be able
to
> point out the moral lesson to kids, e.g. "Making fun of people's
> weight is a really Slytherinish thing to do). (They'd just sigh
and
> groan and tell me to get on with the story anyway.)
>
> hfakhro wrote:
>
> >This really bothered me too, especially when I was reading GoF.
That
> >was when Dudley was forced on a diet, and when the twins played a
> >prank on him with the toffee. I thought Harry was awful for
laughing
> >at him then (at least, it keeps us knowing that he's not perfect.)
>
> Arthur accuses the twins of Muggle-baiting and they protest that
that
> isn't what they were doing. I think the following exchange works
just
> as well if one accuses them of being cruel to Dudley because he's
> obese:
>
> "We didn't give it to him because he's [fat]!"
> said Fred indignantly.
> "No, we gave it to him because he's a great bullying
> git," said George. "Isn't he, Harry?"
> "Yeah, he is, Mr. Weasley," said Harry earnestly.
>
> He =is= a great bullying git, and Harry has been systematically
> tormented by him for most of his life. If anyone deserves to be
> amused by Dudley's unpleasant experience, it's him. I feel sorry
for
> Dudley, here and elsewhere--parents who raise their children to be
> spoiled bullies are doing them no favors--but I was rather touched
by
> the evidence that Fred and George have been paying attention to
> Harry's descriptions of life with the Dursleys these past three
years.
I agree with all your points here... I remember when I read GoF, I
was very touched by the twins' coming to pick Harry up, and don't get
me wrong I love the twins in general. I think they're absolutely
lovely to Harry throughout the books. I think their heart was in the
right place with that prank, (they've heard about what a bully Dudley
used to be with Harry - why not test out Wizard Wheezes on him,
right?) I never questioned the twins' motives. My problem is that I
actually kind of agree with Arthur Weasley here. I hope JKR addresses
the question of muggle/wizard relations closely in the future,
because I think it's an important lesson for Harry and for the
readers. (Maybe Harry doesn't need that lesson though... I think he's
pretty sensible about muggles in general, but that's a different
topic.)
OK remember in book 1, Hagrid insults Dudley the minute he sees him
(something like, "shove up, you great lump") and then proceeds to
give Dudley a pig's tail? And they have to go to hospital to get it
removed? Then in book 3, Harry blows up Dudley's aunt, and in book 4,
he gets "ton-tongued". Dudley is *terrified* of wizards and magic, he
goes around holding his backside to prevent future attacks similar to
Hagrid's. Now I'm not questioning Hagrid or the twins for this
behaviour, because I think their motives are pure; they do it out of
defense of Harry. And I agree that Harry himself is justified in
laughing at Dudley because of all the abuse he tolerated from him
growing up. What I was trying to say in my not-very-well-written
post, was that I hope JKR is going somewhere with this portrayal of
Dudley. The fact that she has said in an interview that she feels his
childhood is just as scarred as Harry's in some ways gives me hope
that she will do that. Because I think Dudley is a product of
something else (the Dursleys' questionable parenting), and I think
she needs to address that and his personality. I think he shouldn't
be laughed at, and tricked by people he is terrified of, rather it
should be the Dursleys themselves who get attacked for what they've
produced. And I agree that Dudley being fat is overly emphasised, and
therefore I think (hope?) there is a reason for that - hopefully
we'll find out in the upcoming books. Does that make sense? I guess
it also shows JKR's genius in that in reality, it is the kids who get
laughed at for their parents' mistakes, and I find that cruel. Even
Harry himself gets ridiculed by the Dursleys for being abnormal, even
though he can't help that he was born into a wizarding family.
I guess another way of looking at it is through the portrayal of
Draco. How many people get sick of the way he is portrayed in the
books? I know that in fanfiction Draco-redemption is a popular theme,
because people believe that he is too one-sided. His father's a bully
therefore he's a bully. Same goes for Vernon and Dudley - they're
both ignorant and they're both bullies. My take on this is that for
all of JKR's "it's about your choices and not your abilities" (and by
extension, your background) morals, she seems to fail (so far) with
the portrayal of Dudley and Malfoy. She makes them both out to be
exactly like their families, stereotypically bad/ignorant. Even
better examples of this are Crabbe and Goyle. (How on earth are they
in 'cunning' Slytherin if they're so stupid?!) I'm not saying that
this is not going anywhere; I think she knows exactly what she's
doing with these characters. I'm just saying that so far I don't like
the way they are written because they encourage the bad/good
stereotypes that I think these books generally do a marvellous job of
avoiding.
My thoughts are not fully formed on this yet and I didn't get much
sleep last night so I am slightly muddled, but I would be interested
in hearing people's reactions to this...
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive