[HPforGrownups] Re: enigmatic Bill .... the missing Weasley child

[JamiDeise at aol.com]

No: HPFGUIDX 21423

In a message dated 6/25/2001 4:25:16 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
rcraigharman at hotmail.com writes:

<< On the other hand, it is quite possible that if Ron had a deceased
 brother he might not mention it simply because there might not be
 much of a story to it.  I know that some people in the "dead Weasley"
 camp expect that it had something to do with VWI.  I think it could
 easily have been more mundane -- like an infant dying shortly after
 childbirth, who might otherwise have been stillborn or the like.
  >>

I doubt it, just because if there were something as significant as a deceased 
child, it would be pointless to have the baby die from natural causes ... 
unless it forwards the plot in some way, there's no reason for it.

Jami