evil Weasly? was Re: the missing Weasley child

[meckelburg at foni.net]

No: HPFGUIDX 21490

Hi All!
great explanation. if an additional Weasly, before Charlie,or 
between Bill and Percy doesn't change much, was evil, and perhaps 
sent to Azkaban, this would also explain the following.
When Harry asked Ron about Azkaban, Ron said his father hadhad to 
make a visit there and came back very shaken ( can't give the 
exacte quote. my HP-books are upstairs- and so are thhe children 
(never tickle a sleeping dragon- and never ever wake up a 2year old 
wizard!!<g>))
I always thought he had to go there for the MoM, but do we know for 
sure?
just a thought
Mecki

--- In HPforGrownups at y..., mediaphen at h... wrote:
> Hi everybody!
> 
> This missing-weasley-child-thread has been very interesting, indeed. 
> However, the speculation seems to be about a son between Charles and 
> Percival being killed by V/DE/insert-favourite-nasty-critter-here or 
> sadly stillborn.
> Now, here're my thoughts on the matter, and please forgive me if 
> someone has posted this before (I searched the archives but didn't 
> find it):
> When Arthur and Molly got married they had their first child, a boy 
> whose name we do not know yet. They had two more babies, Bill and 
> Charlie, but shortly after Charlie was born, the oldest boy started 
> behaving strangely. He seemed to be extremely rude and nasty to his 
> brothers and all the other kids in the neighbourhood. By the time he 
> was old enough to go to school, he promptly declared that he was 
> going to Durmstrang to get the best education in the Dark Arts as 
> possible. Arthur and Molly was of course both depressed and furious 
> that their child had turned out to be evil. Once finished at 
> Durmstrang, The Bad Weasley returned to Britain to join Voldie, and 
> wether he died in VWI or was taken to Azkaban is besides the point, 
> he was neither a son af Arthur's and Molly's, nor a brother of B, C, 
> P, F&G, R and G's, as far as they saw.
> This little theory of mine would explain a few things:
> 1. If, indeed, Ron has an unknown older brother, it would explain 
why 
> the Weasleys never talk about him. When you reject a son or brother 
> you're not too keen on bringing this up: "Well, I have to keep up 
> with my brothers, you know, Harry." said Ron. "Percy is a prefect, 
> Charlie was the best Quidditch player in years, Bill was Head Boy, 
> and my oldest brother was a personal advisor to You-know-who."
> 2. The gap between Charlie and Percy. If Charlie was newborn when 
the 
> Bad Weasley started showing his true colours, A&M wanted to be sure 
> he was the only bad apple in the bag. When Bill turned out fine, 
they 
> started, hmm, reproducing again.
> 3. Ron's comment about being the sixth of his brothers to go too 
> Hogwarts. True (according to this theory), The Bad Weasley went to 
> Durmstrang.
> 
> Please don't hurt me, Weasley-lovers out there (mind you, I too love 
> the Weasleys as much as the next guy, Gredandforge is definately my 
> favourite major character). The bad Weasley is probably misled by 
the 
> Dark side, and it is not A&M's fault, whatsoever. We don't blame 
Lily 
> for Petunia's being an arse, do we?
> As for the little "jokes" I threw in, please forgive me, they're 
only 
> there to lighten up an otherwise rather dark subject (and a dark 
> theory).
> 
> From one thing to another: I see people throw in their personal wand 
> specifications here and there. Where can I find that quiz? I have 
> located the character quiz and the sorting (Hermione/Ron, of 
> Ravenclaw, BTW) but not the Wand-chose-o-matic.
> 
> Martin, who is yet to find GoF in Swedish bookstores (thank the 
maker 
> for Amazon!)
> 
> Favourite Being: The Swedish Shourt-Snout
> Favourite Magical Sport: The Annual broom race between Kopparberg 
and 
> Arjeplog.