killing voldemort/ dumbledore cold & calculating?

[pbnesbit at msn.com]

No: HPFGUIDX 14347

--- In HPforGrownups at y..., voicelady at m... wrote:
> (This will be a rrather short post.  My apologies in advance.)
> 
> On Wed, 14 March 2001, "Scott" wrote:
> 
> > The way I see it if Harry uses AK to kill Voldemort then he is 
stooping to Voldemort's level and is therefore no better than the 
evil he is destroying. Then again I am strongly against violence of 
any kind. I'm not saying that Voldemort SHOULDN'T be destroyed but 
just that I think it would be counter productive to show Harry doing 
it and then be lauded as a hero. (Even if he personally feels guilt.)
> 
> This is why I don't think Harry will be the one to kill Voldemort.  
I think he will have ample opportunity, but not be able to do it.  
That's when Peter will step in and kill Voldemort for him.
> 
> If someone has already postulated this theory, I apologize 
pprofusely for thinking I was original. <g>
> 
> Jeralyn, the Voicelady
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> "Oh, obvious," said Granny.  "I'll grant you it's 
> obvious.  Trouble is, just because things are obvious 
> doesn't mean they're true."
> Terry Pratchett, Wyrd Sisters
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> _____________________________________________________________
> This email message was sent via MailStation(tm) - a trademark 
> of CIDCO Incorporated.


Ah, Jeralyn, great minds think alike!

I've been forming this theory ever since Dumbledore told Harry that 
since he'd saved Pettigrew's life that he was in debt to Harry.  My 
theory is that he'll both exonorate Sirius as well as kill 
Voldemort.  

Peace & Plenty,

Parker
----------------------------------------------------------------------
'...I can teach you how to bottle fame, brew glory, even stopper 
death...' Severus Snape, Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone
----------------------------------------------------------------------