What was the Plot-Hole? JKR answers
love2write_11098 at yahoo.com
love2write_11098 at yahoo.com
Tue May 8 04:55:52 UTC 2001
No: HPFGUIDX 18347
--- In HPforGrownups at y..., Dave Hardenbrook <DaveH47 at m...> wrote:
> It's still not clear what the hole is... Why couldn't "Icicle" (her
rumored
> name) have been the "faithful servent at Hogwarts"? Then Moody
could
> have been Moody and everything would have made sense. Is the
problem
> that it has to have been someone who could have put his name in the
GoF?
> But she could have, if she was old enough to be a Judge or
Tournament
> organizer. (She'd probably have to be to be a Death Eater.)
>
>
>
> -- Dave
Well, if that was the plan then there is another whole part of the
books gone -- imagine a Weasley cousin being a Death Eater! That
would have been quite the scandal. But having to pull an entire
character is a big deal; all the scenes with that person have to be
completely rewritten. If I got halfway through a book and realized I
had to pull a character, I think I'd cry.
But I don't think that's what you're asking. The plot hole is this:
you can't have two characters fulfilling the same purpose. It's
wasteful. Plots have to be tight, especially when it's already as
long as GoF. If you look at HP -- all good books in fact -- each
character adds something to the story, and none of them bring the
same thing. You can have a character that you're totally in love
with, but if she/he doesn't have a definite purpose, you have to get
rid of him/her. Kill your darlings, as Stephen King said. JKR's books
are long, but no scene goes wasted. Everything furthers the plot. And
that was the hole; Icicle wasn't needed. She didn't further the plot.
And so a lot of time was spent in cutting her out.
Stacy
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive