The obviousness of the broom (was Re: Chairs & MOVIE)
A.E.B.Bevan at open.ac.uk
A.E.B.Bevan at open.ac.uk
Tue Oct 9 14:45:40 UTC 2001
No: HPFGUIDX 27365
But if they had put the broom in a box they woulnd't have had to put
a broom in a box. Thats to say the owl could carry a light packet
made up only of paper; and cutting the shots would have shown a broom
coming out of similar wrapping a few moments later. Magic cinema
style. No they wanted the broom shown flown in for some reason...
Edis
> -Luke-caliburncy at y... wrote:
quite possible, if they aren't changing the scene for reasons of
> length, is that there was a logistical problem for the owl. It
sounds like it was an absolute nightmare for him to carry that
package just for reasons of weight, and they almost didn't think
they could pull it off. Putting the broom in a box, as I seem to
recall it was in the book, would only have exacerbated their
difficulty in making it possible for the owl to carry it.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive