[HPforGrownups] Living With Sirius
SALeathem at aol.com
SALeathem at aol.com
Sat Oct 27 19:05:40 UTC 2001
No: HPFGUIDX 28290
<< I find it disturbing that no one seems at all concerned by the
fact that he blithely sent Snape off to the Shrieking
Shack where Snape would have ended up dead or a
werewolf himself, and Remus would have had to live
with the guilt of killing or afflicting Snape for the
rest of *his* life as well. But no, they brush it off
as a "prank."
Either Sirius is so thoughtlessly impulsive and
completely oblivious to the possible consequences of
his actions, or he's so emotionally unstable that he's
capable of killing Snape in cold blood simply because
Snape followed him and his friends around. Yeah,
that's a "crime" really deserving of death or
lycanthropy, Sirius. >>
Remember, when Sirius did that he was just a kid. A 16 year old boy. How many
16 year old boys do you know that think before they act? How many 16 year
olds in general bother to consider their actions before they do anything? Not
many. Boys in particular are still very immature at that age, look at what
they get up to. I'm not saying of course that 16 year old girls are saintly
virgins, but in comparison to the boys of the same age for the most part they
are slightly more mature... (only just very slightly, and only in some
cases...)
<< I'm just wondering if we shouldn't have a knee-jerk
"aww, he's Harry's godfather and is being nice to him,
so we should like him" reaction. If Snape hadn't
pointed out that Sirius' "prank" almost resulted in
murder, I'd think it was JKR glossing over the darker
implications of Sirius' actions for the sake of
keeping it black and white for the kids >>
I don't see it like that. As stated before, he was a 16 year old boy when he
did that and 16 year old boys do not think before they act. If it was the
other way round, do you really think Snape would have been mature enough to
think before he acted? I doubt it. He probably would have carried it off as
well, and thought it was really funny too. Maybe he might have thought better
of it at the last moment, maybe he wouldn't.
I think in way, Snape's showing his immaturity in not being able to let it
drop (yeah I know, it was a big deal, he could have died/ended up a werewolf,
he could have ruined Lupins life even more as well... but again, if the boot
was on the other foot etc.) by holding a grudge against Harry for the actions
of Harry's father. He's acting incredibly childish by doing that (similar to
Draco for being mean to Hermione cos she was muggle born/keen, not liking Ron
cos his family's poor etc). Unless there is something else that we haven't
learned about (such as maybe he was in love with Lily... his jealously of
James for being a good quidditich player, although strictly speaking, we do
know about that already), I think it's immature of Snape to act as he does
towards Harry because he doesn't like James. Especially seeing how James
died. I just keep on thinking, c'mon Severus, isn't it about time you grew
up?? I also think, that in a way, the way Snape tells Harry it was as if he
was saving it to have maximum impact and to deliberatly to upset Harry.
<< I will say, however, that the first couple of times I
read PoA, I really liked Sirius. I had the "aww, how
sweet, he's an innocent man unfairly accused. Oh, how
he's suffered, poor ickle Siri-kins" reaction. >>
The first time I read PoA I was suspicious of Lupin, and not too keen on
Sirius either. After it had all been revealed I still wasn't sure of either
of them really. Reading it again, I like Lupin a lot more, and it makes sense
about the sneakoscope - on the train the first time I thought it was going
off at Lupin, and then in the bedroom I thought it was faulty (Ron had said
Bill had reckoned it was faulty because it went off at dinner, but he didn't
know that Fred & George had put something in his soup) or was maybe being
activated by Crookshanks. But on the second reading, it's clear it was
Wormtail/Scabbers that made it go off all of the time. As opposed to
Crookshanks or Lupin.
As for Sirius, I was slightly more sympathetic to him, but his behaviour in
the shrieking shack was still a worry. Mainly the choking Harry bit. He might
of course, just be one of those people who, when angry, just see red and
totally go off their nut. He might also be truely evil and we're yet to see
it. But I think it's more likely that he just has a nasty temper, but is
really a nice bloke. Seems to me, if that was the case, James would have been
a nice foil to him, from what we've learnt about James so far.
Sara
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive