Priori Incantantem/Deletrius
cynthiaanncoe at home.com
cynthiaanncoe at home.com
Sat Sep 8 03:42:11 UTC 2001
No: HPFGUIDX 25745
I was reading the Lexicon (again!) and something about the wand order
mystery occured to me. The Lexicon raises the issue of whether V
must have tried to kill Harry before killing James and Lily based on
the wand order in GoF, because the spell that rebounded onto V didn't
come out of V's wand in the graveyard scene.
I was wondering whether priori incantantem causes the wand to
regurgitate all past spells, or only all *successful* spells.
In "The Dark Mark", Amos Diggory uses "Prior Incantato" to
discover "the last spell a wand performed." Dumbledore uses the same
description in "The Parting of the Ways": the wand will
regurgitate "spells it has performed." Dumbledore also says that V's
wand would have regurgitated "the last *murders* the wand
performed." So would a "failed" spell like the one used on Harry be
considered a spell that was "performed" such that it would be
regurgitated? It certainly didn't result in a murder, as Harry
lived. If not, then the "wand order scene" is entirely consistent
with the sequence that V killed James, then Lily, then failed to kill
Harry.
Also, in the Dark Mark, Amos Diggory makes the ghost spell vanish "in
a wisp of smoke" by saying "Deletrius." So in the graveyard, why
doesn't Voldemort just say "Deletrius" to make Cedric, Lily, James
and the other ghosts disappear in a "wisp of smoke?" Is Voldemort,
powerful wizard and former head boy, such a poor study that he
doesn't remember "Deletrius" when someone like Amos Diggory does?
Cindy (who thinks Voldemort might wish to consider a refresher course
in world domination)
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive