Finishing Voldemort
davewitley
dfrankiswork at netscape.net
Tue Apr 23 09:03:28 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 38065
This post is also, in a tangential sort of way, a response to Philip
Nel's and Luke's questions of yesterday, at least it touches on some
literary parallels and, given that I know very little about it,
archetypal literature. (I wonder if an explanation of the term is
required?)
Pippin wrote:
> Anton Chekhov is supposed to have said that if you hang a gun
on the wall in the first act, it must fire in the third. If that
sword [Gryffindor's] doesn't prove to be Voldemort's bane, I'll eat
my laptop.
That is very appealing, but it somehow puts the symbol before the
substance. In the books, Voldemort is the personification of evil
(Dumbledore has made plain in PS that he is not the essence of evil),
so the first question is, what will eventually be done about him?
I think it could be argued that, for want of a better phrase, the
resolution of the Voldemort problem will define what the series is
seen to be about in retrospect.
Killing him is one answer, but not the only one. Even if he is
killed, it won't necessarily be in a duel with Harry, as frequently
seems to be assumed, even though three out of four books have ended
thus. Other plausible possibilities, with literary/RL parallels are:
suicide (eg Hitler);
being dissolved in his own evil, or caught in his own trap (think
Willow);
having his essence magically undone at a remote location (Sauron is
the most familiar example, but it's fairly common in literature);
repenting (usually conveniently followed by death, though IMO this is
not absolutely necessary - think Darth Vader, or the apostle Paul);
being absorbed by good into a higher unity for which his contribution
is necessary (Wizard of Earthsea).
Implausible (IMO) possibilities are:
the WW reaches a political compromise with V;
V goes his way and the rest of the WW go theirs - a true postmodern
ending;
he carries on as shadow in the forest;
he wins that duel;
Harry and friends realise 'there is only power, and those too weak to
seek it';
war unending (Manicheanism made flesh);
V is shunted off into a parallel universe more suited to his
temperament (sort of like Andre Norton's Witch World);
everybody dies (Shakespeare);
he is transfigured into a baby and time-turned back to 1927, Little
Hangleton, to endlessly repeat the cycle (this means he is not really
a descendent of Salazar Slytherin; Harry Harrison's Stainless Steel
Rat Saves the World, Grounhog Day).
Many of the above endings could involve Gryffindor's sword. Each one
would imply a different message about the place and destination of
evil in the world.
David
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive