The benefits of metathinking
darrin_burnett
bard7696 at aol.com
Fri Aug 9 02:43:15 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 42333
I realize metathinking is a bit of a dirty word, but let me speak in
favor of it.
There have been a lot of great theories floated the last few days,
especially regarding the night James and Lily died. And the MAGIC
DISHWASHER theory still pokes its head up from time to time.
Canon can be interpreted in many different ways, especially when it
comes to events such as the night James and Lily were killed and what
Snape knew, when he turned and why.
So, we are left with a bunch of different theories, each plausible
and each fitting with what we know about characters. It works for
Sirius to really be Sirius or for Sirius to be a Polyjuiced
Pettigrew, for example.
It works for Snape to have been in love with Lily or in a life debt
to James. Or both.
Even the DISHWASHER, in all its glory, works.
So we are left with what makes a good story.
I disapprove of DISHWASHER not because it doesn't work, but because I
do not want to see a tortured, ambigious character like Snape become
cleaner, which is what happens. The whole idea that he is able to
operate on six different mental levels WHILE pretending to be so
furious he can't see straight cheapens, not strengthens the
character. It takes away what makes him so interesting -- he's a
tragic and heroic figure who hates most of the people he's fighting
with and truly despises the boy who he knows will probably be the
linchpin in his battle.
In fact, I'd go further. I'd love the idea of him wanting nothing
more than to go back to the early days of the DE life, before
whatever life-changing experience he suffered made him turn. That was
a good time to him, I'd like to think, but he knows he can never go
bac.
But to have the anger be an act takes the interest out of the
character.
Likewise, canon surely supports the notion that Lily had help
creating this sacrifice thing, but the image of Dumbledore (or worse,
Snape) and Lily hammering this thing out is just ... wrong... to the
story, IMHO. What makes the sacrifice so poignant is the idea of the
suddeness of it, the almost instinctual desire for Lily to protect
her son.
It is a better story to have what she did unaltered as possible by
the machinations of Dumbledore, which frankly, takes the focus away
from Harry. He becomes a pawn in a giant game between D-Dore and V-
Mort, INSTEAD of the wild card who changed the game completely,
surprising both sides. By having D-Dore engineer the thing, or at
least partially do so, HE becomes the true epicenter of the story,
not Harry.
Unacceptable.
A little metathinking goes a long way.
Darrin
-- Just Metathink
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive