Fred and George: The Bullies You Do Know
darrin_burnett
bard7696 at aol.com
Fri Aug 23 14:20:13 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 43057
My old friend Jenny:
> I don't dislike the twins as much as Elkins does (I'm not betraying
> you, Elkins!), but they have done things that we wouldn't excuse
from someone else. Darrin and many others simply abhor Draco and
love to see him get a comeuppance at any opportunity. Draco says
hateful, racist things and plans pranks that backfire. Fred and
George don't seems to harbor any prejudices (except against Cedric, I
suppose), so their motives aren't as clear. They are in Gryffindor,
they are excellent athletes, they are confident and they are nice to
Harry. Is that why so many people think they are funny and why
people are so quick to excuse them?
>
> --jenny from ravenclaw, who would also probably dislike Fred and
> George in real life but who would be very sad if either of them
died
> in the series
> *****
First, how can you be prejudiced against a single person? Their
chilliness, and that's what it is, nothing more, toward Cedric in GoF
is sour grapes. Is it perfect behavior? No, but it certainly doesn't
make them bullies.
Again, canon tells us they just don't talk much to Cedric. They don't
even bring the game up. Amos Diggory handles that. For crying out
loud, it's not an Azkaban-offense.
And let us turn the tables -- again -- and see how the sour grapes
toward Harry plays out when Harry is entered in the Tournament. Egged
on by Draco, the entire school (save Hermione and many Gryffs) turns
on Harry for a brief period of time.
To compare Fred and George being cold to Cedric in a small group to
Draco's actions is unconscionable.
Tell me, what would you do if you found a "so-and-so" stinks sign in
your room? I would hope you'd confiscate it.
But would you apply the same logic and severity to what amounts to a
playground argument that doesn't even really amount to much, over
whose team should have won? I would hope not.
And again, we have plenty of cues how important Quidditch is to some
people. Cedric's father, the adult of the group, is obnoxious over
what is at best, a tainted victory.
I don't live in Europe, so I don't get the soccer shenanigans, but I
can tell you that if you want to make a Bostonian cry, just mention
Bill Buckner in 1986. 16 years ago, and it still has an effect.
Now, why are F&G are liked.
1) They laugh at themselves just as easily, as evidenced by their
reactions when they failed to cross the age line. Subtler touches are
their reactions to the sweaters, or losing points. They are
confident, which means they understand when a joke is a joke, played
on them or played by them.
2) When it comes time to be serious, they get serious. George yells
at Oliver Wood when he thinks Wood is being too cavalier with Harry's
safety in the Rogue Bludger game.
And one of the most touching little subtle moments in the books is
George's sudden bout of seriousness when he sees the booklist in CoS
and realizes his parents are going to have to give something else up
to pay for them.
Now tell me that when Draco makes fun of the Weasley's wealth, it is
somehow on par with Fred and George's pranks. Anyone that says so is
again, being unconscionable.
3) Draco is racist. I cannot put in any plainer than that. To
apologize for Draco is to apologize for a stone-cold racist.
Therefore, to credibly compare anyone to Draco is to necessarily
prove that person or persons is also racist. Fred and George are not.
They do not tinge their humor at anyone group in particular.
4) Fred and George have never behaved with any kind of superiority
complex, as Draco does. If anything, they are compensating for
inferiority complexes, considering they have Percy, Bill and Charlie
to live up to. Their grades aren't as good as Percy and Bill, and
they are talented at Quidditch, but not the natural Charlie was. It's
a way to get noticed, but as I said, when it comes time to get
serious, they get serious.
The pranks on Percy and Ginny have been taken to task as picking on
weaker kids. Hold on, the twins put beetles in Bill's soup and
constantly tweak their mother, so older sibling and authority figures
are fair game as well. Thus endeth THAT argument.
People have taken the opportunity to lambast the boys for throwing
snowballs at Quirrell. I think they miss the point.
Draco picks on teachers as well, Hagrid and Lupin being the most
common examples, but he does it out of anger and superiority.
My image of Fred and George is that nothing would have given them
greater pleasure than if Quirrell had fired a snowball right back at
them, maybe even with a little harmless magic oomph.
When Draco gets his comeuppance from a teacher, his first instinct is
to run to Daddy. A bully is a coward deep down.
F&G aren't cowards.
Darrin
- Of course, probably not so harmless, given Quirrellmort. ;)
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive