The Twins vs Percy, family dynamics
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Thu Aug 29 16:04:18 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 43322
Elkins said this:
>>Similarly, in GoF the twins *ought* to know that their pranks
cause Percy distress. They are old enough and bright enough to
understand that continual harassment bothers and upsets
people. They have had ample opportunity to observe that Percy
*is* distressed by their actions, that they have a marked and
negative effect on his ability to cope, and that they are causing
him harm. He protests and he objects; he complains to his
parents; he locks himself in his room. He is not capable of
retaliating in kind -- indeed, he does not retaliate in any way at
all.<<
and this:
>>And what about Percy?
The twins aren't picking on Percy because he has injured them
terribly through any particular action he has taken against them.
They're picking on him because he is *vulnerable,* and because
they have identified some trait that makes him, to their mind, "fair
game," thus enabling them to rationalize their behavior. In
Percy's case, that trait happens to be pomposity. <<
No, I don't think it's quite that simple. Like a magician, the
narrative distracts us by drawing our attention to a disagreement
over style, but there's a grievance with substance underneath it
all, one which accounts for the bitter undertones Elkins detects.
Let's look at chapter 5 of GoF. Percy has some important work
to do, a report about cauldron bottoms for the Ministry. Nobody
else can quite see why it's so important, but they accept that it is,
and they make concessions to him. Percy gets a room of his
own, when everyone else has to double and triple. He gets to
insist on silence, when everyone else wants to make noise,
even though he can Apparate elsewhere and the youngsters
cannot. He gets to exempt himself from all the chores involved
in getting dinner on the table for eleven, though even the family's
guests are pitching in to help.
And then, in the midst of consuming said dinner, he airily
announces that he has subjected his family to all this discomfort
and inconvenience for the sake of his own personal
satisfaction: "I like to keep on top of things," and a vague hope
that Mr. Crouch will be pleased: "a bit sooner than he expected
it...I think he'll be grateful."
If this is a fair sample of Percy's behavior it's not surprising that
the Twins are giving him a hard time. I'd say they are acting out
not only their own resentment, but the resentment of the entire
Weasley family, Molly included, which is perhaps why she chides
the Twins but never seems to actually punish them for plaguing
Percy.
In fact, Percy wants to have his cake and eat it too. He's rejecting
many of his family's values, but he's still expecting, and
demanding, to be treated as the favorite son. That would create
conflict in any family.
Since the Weasley's conflict resolution skills are only a notch
above Punch and Judy's, consisting of a) snarling rages, and b)
the silent treatment, The Twins express their resentment in the
only way they know. They can't lose their tempers in Molly/Ron
fashion, since they would probably hurt somebody, and frosty
silence wouldn't get the message across where Percy's
concerned, so they take out their anger in pranks and needling.
Displaced anger over Percy could even be behind some of the
other Weasley troubles, such as Ron's eruptions of jealousy and
Ginny's retreat into the diary's world of madness.
Pippin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive