TBAY: Crouch - "My mother saved me." (5 of 9)
ssk7882 <skelkins@attbi.com>
skelkins at attbi.com
Sun Dec 8 02:44:09 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 47932
Five
"My mother saved me."
---------------
"Crouch had been serving the forces of evil his entire life," Elkins
states, from up high on her pale hobby horse. "He really *was*
Ever So Evil, you know."
Eileen says nothing for a long time. She rearranges the little
paper cups on her CRAB CUSTARD table, casts a despairing look over
to the long line which has now formed at Cindy's Rookwood thong
booth, and then ducks down beneath her folding table. After a few
moments of rummaging around through a small cardboard box down there,
she straightens, red magic marker in one hand. She clambers up onto
the table and reaching up, adds a phrase to the CRAB CUSTARD banner
hanging above her display.
"C.R.A.B.C.U.S.T.A.R.D," the banner now reads. "So exciting it'll
make your eyes bulge! More Dark Sexiness than even Augustus
Rookwood! Try some today!"
She hops down, somewhat out of breath, and glares at Elkins.
"I'm beginning to see why you liked Brutus so much," she says. "The
*other* Brutus, I mean. Brutus Jr. The one with a taste for
*parricide.* And for *stabbing.* This is...this is just a
*character assassination!*"
"Character assassination?" Elkins thinks about this for a moment,
then smiles. "Character assassination," she repeats. "Heh. Oh.
Oh, Eileen. I am only getting started. I did tell you that I hadn't
even begun to touch on Mr. Crouch's iniquities, didn't I? Trust me.
I have only just begun." Her lips draw back in a snarl. "I have not
yet made my peace with Mr. Crouch."
"Yes," says Eileen, in a tight little voice. "Well. We all know
what your bias is, don't we. But I can't believe that you actually
just...just thematically *hedgehogged* poor Barty Crouch Sr. Have
you no pity, Elkins?"
Elkins tilts her head to one side and peers down at Eileen over the
tops of her spectacles.
"You told me that you *wanted* me to attack Crouch Sr." she reminds
her. "You said that you liked nothing better. You claimed that you
found it exciting. You explained that you were suckled on
controversy. And you insisted that you really *did* want to hear me
out on this subject."
"I really did say that all of that," Eileen agrees glumly. "Didn't
I."
"Yes. You did."
"Can I take it back?" Eileen asks, without much hope.
"No. But if you like, we can take a short breather from Crouch's
iniquities. A little break, perhaps, Eileen? A little pause?"
Elkins grins wolfishly. "How about we talk about Mrs. Crouch for
a while instead?"
"Mrs. Crouch?" Eileen scowls. "Oh, I don't like that Mrs. Crouch.
I don't like her at all."
"I know that you don't. Would you care to explain why?"
"Well, I think my problem is that she put unbearable pressure on her
husband to do something that was totally wrong. I can't forgive her
that. Crouch Sr. made all his other horrible mistakes of his own
volition, but she forced him into that one."
"Did she really?"
"Yes! He couldn't refuse her last request. Because he *was* a man
of honour, Elkins. Just like you've said yourself, even if you are
trying to recant that now. Wizards take last requests very
seriously. The text establishes that through Harry's last actions in
the graveyard. It shows us there that good people, decent people, do
not deny last requests. And people with True Wizarding Pride
*certainly* don't. They honour them. No matter what."
"Hmmmm." Elkins thinks about this. "You know, you may have a point
there?"
"Of course I have a point there! Mrs. Crouch left her husband no
choice. And that's precisely why I dislike her so. Let's just say
that I don't like dying characters who impose last commands on their
loved ones."
"No," agrees Elkins. "That really isn't fair play, is it? Ugly
coercive behavior, that. Mrs. Crouch really does seem to have been a
nasty passive-aggressive piece of goods. *Especially* if it's true
that the wizarding world holds the honoring of last requests as an
important part of its ethos. That would make it very coercive
behavior indeed, wouldn't it? Why, it would be almost as bad as
placing disobedient family members under the Imperius Curse! Or
casting over-enthusiastic memory charms on your subordinates!"
"Or keeping the man that you're impersonating under the Imperius
Curse and locked half-freezing in a trunk while you *interrogate* him
for seven months?" demands Eileen angrily. "Or torturing two people
into a state of irrevocable insanity?"
"Well," says Elkins, laughing. "Quite a bit less severe than *that,*
I'd say. But similarly coercive, yes. Seems to have run in the
family, doesn't it? Definitely unacceptable behavior. Although I
have to say that I do find it rather more sympathetic for someone to
engage in that sort of behavior in order to save a human *life* than
I do for someone to engage in it just to protect himself from
exposure as a law-breaker. Or to gratify his lust for dominion by
seeking to bend his rebellious son to his will. Or to facilitate the
return of Voldemort, for that matter," she adds, almost as an
afterthought.
"Well, I still don't like Mrs. Crouch," Eileen says stubbornly. "She
used unfair tactics to force her husband into doing something that he
really didn't want to do...in the name of love. It sickens me
somehow, even if she was brave to die in Azkaban like that, and did
sacrifice herself for her son."
"Even if she was brave to die in Azkaban like that," Elkins repeats
slowly. "And did sacrifice herself for her son." She smiles and
shakes her head.
"What?"
"Coercive behavior," says Elkins. "Unbearable pressure. Something
that no one with Proper Wizarding Pride could ever refuse. Not
ever. Not under any circumstances. No matter what. She left him no
choice. She forced his hand. She made him do it." She
sighs. "Eileen," she says. "You don't really *believe* that story,
do you?"
"What?"
"The 'last favor' story. Do you really believe it?"
"Man, these Rookwood thongs really *move,*" announces Cindy,
returning to the CRAB CUSTARD table with a smug smile on her face and
a considerable quantity of galleons jingling in her pockets. She
lowers herself into one of the wooden benches lining the promenade
and puts her feet up. "I'm completely out. What is Elkins saying
now?"
"She's trying to claim that Barty Crouch didn't really save his son
from prison to honor his wife's dying request," Eileen tells
her. "So *typical.* Elkins just doesn't want to give poor Barty a
pass on a single one of his fatal errors, is what I'm thinking."
"Well, really, Eileen," says Elkins. "Have you ever paused to
consider the *source* of that story?"
"Its source? You mean the *canon*?"
"No, I mean its source *within* the canon. Where does this idea that
Crouch only saved his son to honor his wife's dying request come from
in the first place? Where does it originate? How do we know that it
really happened that way?"
"Well, we know it because..." Eileen begins, then stops. "Oh," she
says. "Oh."
"Yes?"
Eileen closes her eyes. "We know it," she says slowly. "Because his
son says so."
"Yes," says Elkins. "We know it because his son says so."
She reaches into her satchel, pulls out her own copy of _GoF,_ opens
it to the right page, and begins to read:
"'My mother saved me. She knew she was dying. She persuaded my
father to rescue me as a last favor to her. He loved her as he had
never loved me. He agreed.'"
She slams the book shut.
"That," she says. "Is our *only* evidence for this notion that Crouch
saved his son's life only because his wife put unbearable
psychological pressure on him to convince him to do so. That's it.
All of it. How much credence do we give it?"
"Well," says Cindy thoughtfully. "Crouch Jr. did say it under the
influence of the veritaserum. And Winky was right there when he said
it, too, and she didn't contradict him."
"Crouch Jr. also implies that his father never really loved him under
the influence of the veritaserum," Elkins points out. "And Winky
doesn't contradict him when he says that, either. Yet we don't
generally believe him when he says that, do we?"
"Oh, but look," objects Eileen. "These two statements aren't really
at all the same thing. Whether or not Crouch really loved his son is
a matter of opinion. But that he saved his son because his wife made
it her dying request is a statement of *fact.*"
"Is it?" Elkins thinks about this for a moment. "But how would young
Crouch have known it?" she asks.
"What?"
"How would he have *known* it? How could young Crouch possibly have
known anything about the precise nature of his parents' deliberations
over whether or not to save him from Azkaban? It's not as if he was
privy to those conversations. He was in prison at the time.
*Dying.* Really, anything that Crouch Jr. says about his father's
reasons for saving his life has to be one of two things, doesn't it?
Either it's hearsay, something that someone told him directly, or
it's extrapolation from hearsay. Speculation. Deduction."
"I guess so," says Eileen dubiously. "But--"
"And honestly, it seems far more likely to be the latter to me.
After all, who would have told him such a thing? Who told him that
his father was only persuaded to agree to a plan to save him from
prison as a last favor to his dying mother? Can you imagine his
*father* telling him that? 'Just so you know, boy, I would have
happily left you to rot in Azkaban, if only your sainted mother
hadn't forced my hand with that blasted dying request of hers.' I
really can't see that. Can you?"
"Well..."
"And I certainly can't imagine *Winky* telling him such a thing. Not
unless we're willing to propose an Ever So Evil Winky, one who wants
to make sure that young Crouch keeps on hating his father just as
much as he possibly can."
"That Ever So Evil Winky just keeps looking better and better,"
mutters Cindy.
"I know," agrees Elkins. "It's just awful, isn't it? But unless we
want to accept either ESE Winky or a rather stunningly brutal elder
Crouch, I think that we're left with extrapolation. Extrapolation,
speculation, deduction. None of which is precisely immune from bias."
"Yes, we've noticed that," says Eileen, with a pointed look at
Elkins' hobby horse.
"Are you saying that Crouch Jr. was deluded?" demands Cindy.
"Deluded?" Elkins considers the question. She toys absently with her
horse's mane, then looks down and begins plaiting it carefully into
small tight braids. "I think," she says slowly, "that it has got to
be very easy to play Good Parent/Bad Parent when one of your parents
isn't even around to piss you off anymore, while the other one is
holding you prisoner by means of an Unforgivable Curse. I think,"
she says, "that it has got to be even easier to play that game when
one of your parents died in your place in Azkaban, while the other
one first publicly denounced you and then, while you were screaming
and struggling and pleading for mercy while being dragged off by the
dementors, exhorted you at the top of his lungs to go and rot there.
I think," says Elkins. "That it is appallingly easy to idolize and
to romanticize a dead parent under *any* circumstances. But when
that parent actually died in your *stead?*"
Elkins shakes her head. "I don't think that Crouch Jr. had to be
deluded to believe what he believed," she says. "I just think that
he had to be human. We already know that he thought that his father
didn't love him very much. We already know that he loved his mother."
"I'm not sure if Crouch Jr. ever really loved anyone," says Eileen.
"No?" Elkins raises an eyebrow. "Well, if you don't want to ascribe
to him even enough humanity to assume that he loved his mother, you
still must concede that he was highly emotionally *dependent* on
her. Sirius heard him screaming out for her in his cell in Azkaban,
and there was no one he could have been hoping to manipulate by doing
that. There was no one around to hear him. No one who could have
helped him, at any rate. No one who *cared.* I doubt that he was
trying to manipulate the *dementors* by doing that. So I think that
we have to accept that there, at least, he was not acting. That was
genuine. That was for real."
Eileen thinks about this for a moment, then exhales irritably. "Oh,
I just *hate* your Crouch Jr. apologetics, Elkins," she
complains. "You know, now I'm feeling sorry for the evil little
brat?"
"As well you should," Elkins tells her, smiling slightly. "As well
you should. Have you ever wondered how they broke the news to him,
by the way?"
"The news?"
"Of his mother's death. He was dying when his father carted him out
of Azkaban. That was the only reason that his parents were allowed
to visit him in the first place: it was a *death bed* visit. Sirius
saw him leaving while disguised as his mother, and he says that
Crouch was 'half-carrying' him out of there. I very much doubt that
he was in any condition to understand what was going on. He was
probably only vaguely aware of what was happening at the time. So
who explained it to him? How do you explain to a very sick young man
who has just been nursed back from the very brink of death that his
mother has died in his place in Azkaban, and that his father never
claimed her body but instead left her there to be buried on the
prison grounds by dementors?"
"I very much doubt that he cared about that," says Eileen coldly.
"No? Oh, I really wouldn't be so sure about that. There's something
else that we might deduce from Cedric's last request in the
graveyard, you know. We might deduce from it that proper burial is
important to wizards. We learn about the disposition of Mrs.
Crouch's body three times over the course of this novel. Really, she
gets a lot more to do as a *corpse* than she does as a human being.
Sirius tells us about her burial, and then Crouch Jr. mentions it not
just once in the course of his interrogation, but *twice.* He tells
Dumbledore that his mother was buried at Azkaban, bearing his
appearance and his identity, and then later on, he specifies that her
grave is empty. It's utterly redundant information, that. It's
not necessary plot exposition for the reader, and it isn't
information that Crouch Jr. needs to provide in order to satisfy the
strictures of his interrogation either. It isn't directly responsive
to Dumbledore's question. He's already explained that his mother was
buried at Azkaban. He's already explained that his father 'staged'
her funeral. Really, the fact her grave is a cenotaph is sort of a
no-brainer, isn't it? It's the default assumption. It goes without
saying. Yet he doesn't allow it to go without saying. Instead, he
says it. Why?"
"Because he has to," says Cindy. "He's under the influence of the
veritaserum, and..."
But Elkins is shaking her head slowly back and forth.
"It doesn't seem to work that way," she says. "No matter what Harry
might have feared when Snape threatened him with the veritaserum, it
doesn't seem to make people babble at random. Crouch Jr's testimony
isn't incoherent. He really doesn't digress all that much in the
veritaserum scene at all. Just about everything that he says is
either directly responsive to a question he's been asked, or it is
plot exposition for the reader's benefit. When he *does* volunteer
extraneous information, it speaks to his character, to his
motivations. When he does digress, it is always on a topic that has
some strong emotional resonance for him."
Elkins pulls a thin red ribbon out of one pocket and begins threading
it into one of the braids of her horse's mane.
"Haven't you ever wondered," she asks, "why Crouch Jr. went to all
the trouble to turn his father's body into a bone and then bury it in
Hagrid's garden, rather than just, say, transfiguring it to dust?
Young Crouch's sense of justice was twisted. It was bent. It was
warped utterly out of proportion. But there wasn't anything
*stunted* about it. If anything, it was overdeveloped.
Overdeveloped, and very badly broken. I'd say that he cared a great
deal about what became of his mother's body. I think that he cared
enormously about that."
"*I* think that he was just a twisted little psycho," Cindy says.
"Well." Elkins shrugs. "The two are hardly mutually exclusive. But
all right. Let's leave aside the question of how Crouch Jr. might
have felt about his father leaving his mother to be buried on prison
grounds by Dark creatures under the identity of a notorious and
publicly loathed convicted criminal. Let's get back on topic.
*Somebody* had to tell young Crouch about his mother's death. Either
Winky did it, or his father did. And I just keep thinking...well,
how would you go about explaining something like that to a very sick
teenager? Especially if he hadn't yet started shooting his mouth off
about wanting to run off to restore his fallen master to power? If
you didn't know yet that he was Ever So Evil? If you thought that he
might actually be repentent, or at least redeemable? Seriously. How
would you?"
"Well," says Eileen slowly. "I guess that all depends. Am I winky,
or am I Barty Crouch Sr.?"
"An excellent question. I'm sure that Winky would have tried to
soften the blow a whole lot more. But whoever it was, I imagine that
they would have emphasized the following factors."
Elkins holds up her hand and begins ticking them off on her fingers.
"Your mother really wanted to do this for you," she says. "She did
it willingly. It was her idea. She absolutely insisted upon it. It
was the very last thing that she wanted to do on this earth..."
"All of which was true," says Cindy.
"All of which was certainly true. But all of which, taken together,
still doesn't quite add up to the story that Crouch Jr. implies: that
his father had been dead-set against the idea, that his ailing mother
had forced his father's hand, that she had only prevailed on her
husband to relent by placing upon him the unbearable onus of a last
request. It doesn't *quite* add up that way. But I can certainly
see how if I had been Crouch Jr, then I might have come up with just
that as my final answer when I sat down to do the math. Especially
given what we see elsewhere of his rationalizations when it comes to
his father."
"His rationalizations?" repeats Cindy, frowning.
"Yes. Have you ever taken a really close look at Crouch Jr's own
account of his rescue from Azkaban? It's actually quite
interesting. Look."
Elkins reaches down into her satchel of Crouch Jr. Apologetics.
After a bit of rummaging, she pulls out a rather thick binder, with
the words "Sympathy For The Devil: Veritaserum, A Close Reading"
written across the top.
"This is young Crouch's own account of his rescue from Azkaban," she
says. "With Winky's interjections and the intrusions of the
narrative voice left out. It's all part of his response to the first
question that Dumbledore puts to him formally: 'How did you escape
from Azkaban?' Listen." She opens the binder to a marked page and
begins to read:
"'They came to visit me. They gave me a draft of Polyjuice Potion
containing one of my mother's hairs. She took a draft of Polyjuice
Potion containing one of my hairs. We took on each other's
appearance....The dementors are blind. They sensed one healthy, one
dying person entering Azkaban. They sensed one healthy, one dying
person leaving it. My father smuggled me out, disguised as my
mother, in case any prisoners were watching through their doors....
My mother died a short while afterward in Azkaban. She was careful
to drink Polyjuice Potion until the end. She was buried under my
name and bearing my appearance. Everyone believed her to be me.'"
Elkins closes the binder.
"That's Crouch Jr's own account of how he was rescued from Azkaban,"
she says. "Do you notice anything unusual about it?"
"His father," Eileen whispers. "Where's his poor father? His father
is barely even *there.*"
"No. He really isn't, is he? Crouch Jr. doesn't even make his
father the subject of his *sentences* when he can avoid it. He
denies his father even the grammatical role of active agent. The
subject of his sentences is almost always either 'my mother' or the
ever-so-evasive 'they.' 'They gave me a draft of Polyjuice Potion
containing one of my mother's hairs.' Yes? Well, *who* did? Who
actually handed him the potion to drink? What do you think, Eileen?"
"His father," says Eileen. "His father did."
Elkins nods. "If he can really remember that event at all," she
says. "If he's not just going by what he was told about it later,
then I'd be willing to bet that it was his father who handed it to
him. If it had been his mother, then he would have said so. He
can't actually lie under the veritaserum, though, so instead he uses
that evasive parental plural. There is only one place in his entire
account of his rescue from prison where Crouch Jr. allows his father
to be the subject of the sentence. 'My father smuggled me out,
disguised as my mother, in case any prisoners were watching through
their doors.' He doesn't deny his father the role of active agent in
that sentence, but he does smear him with that rather dubious
verb. 'Smuggled.' It's as if he wants to taint his father's
involvement as much as possible, to imbue it with criminal
associations. His mother is the one who 'saved' him. His father
just 'smuggled' him.
"And have you ever paused to consider what the very first sentence of
Crouch Jr's confession is? The very first thing that he says under
interrogation?"
"'Yes,'" says Cindy.
Elkins waits.
"No," explains Cindy. "I mean, that's the first thing that he says
under interrogation. Dumbledore asks him if he can hear him. And he
answers: 'Yes.'"
"Oh, for..." Elkins closes her eyes. "Work *with* me here, can't
you? *After* that! The first thing that he says *after* that!"
"Oh, sorry," says Cindy innocently. "I guess I misunderstood."
Eileen giggles.
Elkins glares at both of them. "Dumbledore asks him," she says
through gritted teeth. "How he came to be there. How he escaped
from Azkaban. And the very first thing that he says, his very first
sentence in response is: 'My mother saved me.' Don't you find that
telling? If his affect weren't so deadened, one might even be
tempted to call it defensive. How did you come to be here? 'My
*mother* saved me.' His entire opening paragraph, in fact:
"'My mother saved me. She knew she was dying. She persuaded my
father to rescue me as a last favor to her. He loved her as he had
never loved me. He agreed.'
"It all seems very much of a piece to me. Those concepts all go
together: my mother was the one who saved me, my mother pressured my
father into rescuing me, my father never really loved me. They are a
conceptual whole. Taken together, they form a coherent emotional
argument."
"A coherent emotional argument?"
"Yes. And what that argument says is: 'I didn't owe my father a
damned thing.'"
Eileen nods slowly. "I've never believed Barty Jr. when he says that
his father didn't love him," she says. "It seems to me like the sort
of thing any immature teenager might say."
"Yes. Well, that whole dying request story strikes me in very much
the same way, honestly. It seems like exactly the sort of spin that
an adolescent in young Crouch's position would have put on what he
had very likely been told about his mother's death. It's very
romantic. It's very dramatic. It casts his mother as an absolute
saint, and his father as a bit of an ogre. And it does something
else as well. Something very important."
"It absolves him from gratitude," says Cindy.
"Yep. That's precisely what it does. *Especially* if we assume that
wizards really do take last requests very seriously. If last
requests can't be refused, then what does young Crouch really owe to
his father for saving his life, anyway? Nothing, that's what.
Nada. Zip. Zilch. Zero. He owes it all to his mother. Who,
conveniently enough, is *dead* and therefore in no position to place
any demands on him."
"Convenient, that."
"Oh, it's *very* convenient. Particularly when you consider one last
thing." Elkins takes a deep breath. "By the time that he is
speaking under the veritaserum," she says. "Crouch Jr. has become a
*parricide.* And while we're only guessing that wizards might have a
strong belief in last requests, and while we're only guessing that
they might have strong feelings about proper burial, there is
something that we *know* that they believe in."
She waits.
"We know that they believe in life debts," says Eileen.
"Yes. We know that they believe in life debts. Awkward things, life
debts."
"Don't children owe their parents a life debt as a matter of simple
default?" asks Cindy.
"Awkward things," Elkins says again. "Life debts."
This time, with narrative feeling.
She sighs and presses the heels of her palms hard against her eyes.
"Crouch Jr. implies that his father only saved him because his mother
prevailed upon him to do so," she says. "He says it under
veritaserum, which means that it must be his truth. But his truth is
not necessarily the same thing as his father's truth. And I can
think of far too many reasons why it *would* have been his truth.
And far too few ways that he could possibly have known it for sure.
"I'm somewhat reminded, in fact," she adds, "of that painting that
you linked to, Eileen." She removes her hands from her eyes and
glances over to Eileen. "In your Crouch as Tragic Hero post? The
URL that Porphyria sent you? The one that you proposed as the Crouch
family portrait?"
Eileen nods. "Jacques-Louis David," she says. "_The Lictors Bring
to Brutus the Bodies of His Sons._"
"Yes, that's the one. Brutus' wife is featured in that painting,
isn't she? She's there with her two daughters, on the right hand
side, the very brightest part of the canvas. She's bathed in light.
The viewer's eye is naturally drawn to her first; it just can't help
but be. But she's not really the subject of the painting at all, is
she? The subject of the painting is really her husband. Who is
harder to see. Slower to catch the attention of the viewer.
Obscured in the shadows.
"But Brutus is the *real* subject of that painting," concludes
Elkins. "Not his wife. I don't think that saving his son from
Azkaban was only Crouch's wife's error. I think that it was also his
own. I think that in the end, Crouch saved his son because he wanted
to."
*******************
Elkins
(who prefers The Death of Marat)
**********************************************************************
REFERENCES
This post is continued from part four. It is mainly a response
to messages 45402 (Crouch Sr as Tragic Hero) and 45693 (Crouch and
Winky), but also cites or references messages 43326, 43447, 44636,
46923, and 46935.
"This time, with narrative feeling" -- in some branches of reader
response criticism, 'narrative feeling' is the term used to describe
those emotional reactions to the text which derive from the reader's
engagement with the text's narrative, or story-telling, elements.
The most common example is a reader's sense of personal
identification with a fictional character.
Link to "The Lictors Bring to Brutus the Bodies of His Sons:"
http://www.ibiblio.org/wm/paint/auth/david/brutus.jpg
For further explanation of the acronyms and theories in this post,
visit Hypothetic Alley at
http://www.i2k.com/~svderark/lexicon/faq/
and Inish Alley at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPforGrownups/database?
method=reportRows&tbl=13
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive