The Nature of Cowardice (was Fudge is not evil)
draco382 <draco382@yahoo.com>
draco382 at yahoo.com
Sun Dec 15 22:37:36 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 48362
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, eloiseherisson at a... wrote:
> As for Fudge... well, my views are well known if not well
understood.
> As a *self-interested* coward who will not recognise the threat
posed by
> Voldemort, I view him, if nothing else, as the embodiment of the
> institutionalised evil of a government which will not face up to
the truth
> and act.
>
> As Burke said (and as has been quoted here before), "It is
necessary only for
> the good man to do nothing for evil to triumph."
>
I just finished reading GOF again and am
grinning from ear to ear after seeing this discussion. My general
impression of Fudge is that he is indeed evil (not necessarily
cowardly) and mostly likely working for a government whose main
purpose is to cover up evidence and twist the truth. Being a one
time huge X-Phile, I was reminded of the basic plot line in which a
case would be nearly solved...until evidence/witnesses would be
destroyed under the pretence of an "accident." Fudge is not the
Minister for nothing...he is obviously well versed in official
procedures, and its highly unlikely that he would dispose of such
strong evidence (Barty Crouch Jr.) on accident.
How Fudge got his position and what exactly he has been doing while
in power is something yet to be discovered, but I'm not expecting
his methods to be exactly ethical.
So yeah, I think FIE :-)
my two cents,
draco382
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive