Ron as Sirius and Neville as Peter (was: About Ron again)
blpurdom
blpurdom at yahoo.com
Sun Feb 3 18:30:56 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 34580
--- In HPforGrownups at y..., "meglet2" <mercia at i...> wrote:
> Thanks to everyone who replied. Some very interesting points but
> I'm still a bit worried. The betrayal by the friend who is closer
> than a brother (as Ron is for Harry) is particularly tragic and
> was thought to be the case with James and Sirius. Since we now
> know that to be false it could be that it will be a reality for
> Harry and Ron. I still very much hope not and want Ron to have the
> strength of character to resist any temptations to evil but it
> would be a very strong theme.
I fail to see how the betrayal of Sirius never happening means that
it is MORE likely that Ron will betray Harry. It seems far more
likely that the SAME thing might occur (that people will THINK that
Ron is a traitor for a while, while he has been loyal all along) and
the James/Sirius relationship would therefore serve as foreshadowing.
> I don't think Hermione would be susceptible in the same way
> because I think she a) has more insight into herself and others,
> b) has more strength of character and c) is too unshakeable in her
> loyalty to Harry. But I may be overly biased in her favour. I have
> a lot of fellow feeling for Hermione.
She doesn't have as much insight into herself as she does into
others. (A real blind spot with Gilderoy Lockhart, don't you
think?) She also has shown a tendency to keep important information
to herself (the Time Turner, Lupin being a werewolf). Her loyalty
is unquestionable, however, and therefore anything she does that
inadvertantly hurts Harry, will, I believe, be just that:
inadvertant and done with the best of intentions. Think of the
Firebolt incident: she had the best of intentions and her two best
friends were hacked off at her for a while, but she did what she
thought was right out of loyalty to Harry. She's not afraid to risk
alienating even the people she cares about most to do what she feels
is right.
When Harry, Ron and Hermione are going over the lake as first years
in the first book, they are joined by another person: Neville. It
seems that Neville is the best doppelganger for Pettigrew. He's not
considered very competant and he's at the fringes of the group.
Perhaps his attachment to Hermione (he asked her to the ball) will
spur him to do something traitorous (he could possibly get the
impression she's involved with Harry or Ron whether that's correct
or not). A lot of folks have been rooting for Neville to tap into
the power he "must" have inherited from his parents, but somehow I'm
not completely convinced that would be a good thing...
--Barb
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HP_Psych
http://schnoogle.com/authorLinks/Barb
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive