Snapers or Sirists

[lucky_kari]

No: HPFGUIDX 34688

--- In HPforGrownups at y..., "anmsmom333" <anmsmom333 at c...> wrote:
> --- In HPforGrownups at y..., "kiricat2001" <Zarleycat at a...> wrote:
>Besides, though there is no canon evidence to support my
> theory...there is no canon evidence to prove Sirius meant to really
> "physically hurt" Severus. 

Ummmmm... sending someone down a tunnel, at the end of which is a 
werewolf, and making no attempt to influence the outcome of the 
situation. I may be quick to jump to conclusions, but it looks like 
canonical evidence to me. It was James Potter, not Sirius, who tried 
to change things for the better. 

Now, as I've said before, maybe Sirius wanted Snape bitten and made a 
werewolf. Not justifiable, but in a certain situation, you could see a 
desperate and not very prudent Sirius deciding that it had to happen 
to save his friend. Check message 33857: " New Theory about Why Sirius 
Played Trick on Snape", and there's an acronym, "

It's my favourite theory and has allowed me to get on to liking 
Sirius. I couldn't take him being completely malevolent for no reason, 
or completely immature and braindead for no reason, but doing 
something drastically wrong with good motives... I'm a sucker for 
that.

> Theresa (who wholeheartily agrees with Sirius fans that he is dead
> sexy and would run off with him in a heartbeat but is still 
intrigued
> by Severus but would only "be friends" with him.)

Keep Sirius to yourself, and the post-tramautic issues, as well. :-) 
Though I agree about Severus, provided he is capable of friendship, 
the only HP wizard who has enough sense for my taste is Remus Lupin. 

Eileen